The Oppo Reno4 Lite and Realme X50 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they take different approaches to achieving it, primarily diverging in their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences, and others, to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and sustained performance, the Realme X50 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765G, built on a more efficient 7nm process, offers a noticeable advantage in both CPU and GPU performance, despite similar charging speeds. The Reno4 Lite remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 28. Released 2020, September 28 | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.7 x 7.4 mm (6.30 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Matte Black | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | CPH2125 | RMX2144 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| SAR | 1.44 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo Reno4 Lite
- Potentially more streamlined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS is often less aggressive than Realme UI)
- Slightly slower, but complete, charging cycle (0-100% in 53 minutes)
- Competitive price point for basic users
- Less powerful Helio P95 chipset limits performance in demanding tasks
- 12nm process less efficient than Snapdragon 765G’s 7nm process
- Likely inferior image processing capabilities
Realme X50 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset delivers superior performance
- 7nm process offers better thermal efficiency and sustained performance
- Faster initial charging speed (70% in 30 minutes)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed network access
- Realme UI can be more heavily customized than Oppo's ColorOS
- May require more frequent charging depending on usage patterns
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on cutting-edge tech like LTPO or OLED. However, the Realme X50 5G’s larger screen size (spec not provided, but typical for the model) will benefit media consumption. Bezels are likely comparable, and without specific color accuracy data, it’s safe to assume both offer adequate, but not exceptional, color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme X50 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 765G, offering potentially better image processing and noise reduction. The Reno4 Lite relies on the ISP within the Helio P95, which is generally less capable. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it impossible to definitively declare a winner, but the chipset advantage leans towards the Realme X50 5G.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, fabricated on a 7nm process, is a significant step up from the Oppo Reno4 Lite’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The 7nm node translates to greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the Snapdragon 765G can sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The Snapdragon 765G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver – provides a more balanced and powerful processing experience compared to the Reno4 Lite’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 30W wired charging, offering comparable charging speeds. The Oppo Reno4 Lite reaches 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes, while the Realme X50 5G achieves 70% in 30 minutes. While the Realme charges faster initially, the Reno4 Lite eventually reaches full capacity. Without knowing the battery capacity of each device, it’s difficult to assess real-world battery life. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s superior efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the Realme X50 5G, resulting in comparable or even better endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Lite if you prioritize a slightly more streamlined software experience and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light photography. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you demand better gaming performance, smoother multitasking, and future-proof 5G capabilities, even if it means a potentially more customized software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme X50 5G's Snapdragon 765G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with smooth frame rates. The Adreno 620 GPU provides sufficient graphical power, and the 7nm process helps prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions. Expect a noticeably better gaming experience compared to the Oppo Reno4 Lite.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno4 Lite's Helio P95 chipset struggle with multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Helio P95 can handle basic multitasking, but it will likely show signs of slowdown when running numerous apps concurrently or switching between resource-intensive applications. The Snapdragon 765G in the Realme X50 5G offers a significantly smoother multitasking experience due to its more powerful CPU and efficient architecture.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the two phones?
Both phones support 5G, but the Snapdragon 765G in the Realme X50 5G has a more mature 5G modem and is generally considered to offer more stable and reliable 5G connectivity. The Helio P95's 5G implementation may be less refined.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 70% in 30 minutes (Realme) and 50% in 30 minutes (Oppo) significant in daily use?
While the Realme X50 5G charges faster initially, the difference is less impactful for typical users. The Oppo Reno4 Lite reaches full charge in a reasonable 53 minutes. The convenience of a quicker top-up is valuable, but the overall charging experience is comparable.
