The Oppo Reno4 Lite and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset provides a significant performance advantage over the Reno4 Lite’s Helio P95, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming. While the Reno4 Lite boasts faster 30W charging, the Moto G 5G Plus compensates with comparable battery endurance and a brighter display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 28. Released 2020, September 28 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.7 x 7.4 mm (6.30 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Matte Black | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | CPH2125 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 1.44 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 299926 (v8)
GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 Lite
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially lighter and more compact design (spec data unavailable)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Helio P95 chipset
- Limited display information (brightness, color accuracy)
- Potentially lower camera performance
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- Comparable battery endurance
- Slower 20W charging
- Potentially larger and heavier design (spec data unavailable)
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a display capable of reaching 543 nits of peak brightness, a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Reno4 Lite (brightness data unavailable). Both displays share a 1269:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar dynamic range. However, the Reno4 Lite’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and panel technology unanswered. The Moto G 5G Plus’s higher brightness makes it the clear winner for users who frequently use their phones in sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Moto G 5G Plus likely has a more capable primary sensor. The Reno4 Lite’s camera system may lean towards software enhancements, while the Moto G 5G Plus likely prioritizes hardware quality. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility for serious photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm), built on a more efficient process node than the Oppo Reno4 Lite’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). This translates to superior performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon 765G’s Kryo 475 CPU architecture (1x2.3 GHz Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Gold, 6x1.8 GHz Silver) is more sophisticated than the Helio P95’s (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), offering better multi-core performance. Gamers and power users will significantly benefit from the Moto G 5G Plus’s processing capabilities.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Oppo Reno4 Lite supports 30W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is limited to 20W charging. While slower, the Moto G 5G Plus’s comparable endurance means users won’t be constantly reaching for the charger, mitigating the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Lite if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a lighter, more compact form factor. It’s a good fit for users who frequently top up their phones and value portability. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prioritize overall performance, a brighter and more visible display, and longer sustained performance under load. This phone is ideal for gamers, media consumers, and those who need a reliable all-rounder.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in the Moto G 5G Plus handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is a capable chipset for gaming. While not a flagship processor, it can comfortably run PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal management during extended gaming sessions, reducing the risk of throttling.
❓ How significant is the charging speed difference between 30W (Reno4 Lite) and 20W (Moto G 5G Plus) in real-world use?
While 30W charging is faster on paper, the Moto G 5G Plus’s comparable battery endurance means you won’t necessarily need to charge it as frequently. The Reno4 Lite will get you to 100% quicker, but the Moto G 5G Plus’s battery life minimizes the impact of the slower charging speed for most users.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G supports carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for significantly faster download and upload speeds where available. This is a key advantage for users in areas with robust 5G infrastructure.
