The Oppo Reno4 F and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, primarily through their chipset choices and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset, built on a more efficient 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge and better thermal management, complemented by significantly faster 33W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | SPH2209 | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 370 EUR |
Oppo Reno4 F
- Sleek and lightweight design (assumed based on Reno series history)
- Adequate performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek chipset
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less efficient chipset (12nm Helio P95)
- Potentially lower sustained performance in demanding apps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Faster 33W charging (full charge in 58 minutes)
- More efficient 8nm Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Superior performance in gaming and multitasking
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially larger and heavier build (typical for Redmi Note series)
- Software experience may include more bloatware (typical for Xiaomi)
- Design may be less premium than the Reno4 F
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting display responsiveness. The Reno4 F's Helio P95 may exhibit slightly more lag when rapidly switching between apps or scrolling through content-heavy webpages compared to the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 750G, which benefits from a more modern GPU.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 750G typically offers superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities compared to the Helio P95. This means the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is likely to produce images with better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall clarity, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The ISP's efficiency also impacts video recording quality and stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G (8nm) is a clear advantage over the Oppo Reno4 F’s Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12nm). The 8nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 570 cores are architecturally superior to the Helio P95’s Cortex-A75, resulting in better sustained performance under load. This is particularly noticeable in gaming and multitasking scenarios. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G will maintain higher frame rates for longer periods.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 58 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the Oppo Reno4 F’s 18W charging, which will take considerably longer to replenish the battery. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 750G’s superior power efficiency means the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G will likely offer comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Reno4 F.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 F if you prioritize a sleek design and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light photography. Its Helio P95 is adequate for these scenarios. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you're a more demanding user who values faster performance, enjoys mobile gaming, and appreciates the convenience of rapid charging. The Snapdragon 750G offers a more robust experience for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. The Adreno 619 GPU provides sufficient graphical power, and the 8nm process helps prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions, unlike the Helio P95 which may throttle more quickly.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Oppo Reno4 F in real-world use?
The 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G will reduce charging time by approximately 30-40% compared to the Reno4 F's 18W charging. While the Reno4 F will still charge overnight, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G allows for a significant top-up in a short amount of time, ideal for users who frequently forget to charge their phones.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G supports carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for faster and more reliable 5G speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a key advantage for users in areas with strong 5G coverage.
