The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno4 F and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Reno4 F focuses on a sleek design and balanced feature set, while the Poco X3 NFC aggressively targets gamers and power users with its Snapdragon 732G chipset and rapid charging. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset, built on an 8nm process, delivers noticeably better performance than the Reno4 F’s Helio P95. Coupled with 33W fast charging and a competitive price, the Poco X3 NFC provides superior value for those prioritizing performance and longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Models | SPH2209 | M2007J20CG, M2007J20CT |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | € 259.00 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 2,800,000 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | € 229.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 119.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1299:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 283750 (v8)
GeekBench: 1777 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 F
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Potentially better software optimization for casual use
- May offer a more refined user experience
- Inferior chipset performance compared to Snapdragon 732G
- Slower 18W charging
- Limited information on display quality
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 732G
- 33W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Excellent battery endurance (125h rating)
- Larger and heavier design
- May lack the refined aesthetic of the Reno4 F
- Software experience may be less polished
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno4 F and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC feature displays with a 1299:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the Reno4 F. The Poco X3 NFC’s 6.67-inch display is larger, potentially offering a more immersive viewing experience. Without knowing the Reno4 F’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but the Poco X3 NFC’s larger size is a clear advantage for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture information, or image processing details, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning of the Poco X3 NFC suggests a focus on delivering strong value, potentially including a more capable main camera sensor. The Reno4 F likely prioritizes software-based image enhancements, but the Poco X3 NFC’s hardware advantage is likely to result in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of detail regarding OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 NFC’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm) significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno4 F’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 732G translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations, the Snapdragon 732G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores (2.3 GHz) have a clock speed advantage over the Reno4 F’s Cortex-A75 cores (2.2 GHz). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Poco X3 NFC.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 NFC boasts a 125-hour endurance rating, indicating excellent battery life. Crucially, it supports 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 62% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes. The Oppo Reno4 F, with only 18W charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. While the Reno4 F’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Poco X3 NFC’s faster charging significantly mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage, making it the more convenient option for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 F if you prioritize a more refined aesthetic and a lighter, slimmer profile. It’s a good choice for users who primarily browse social media, make calls, and take casual photos. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC if you’re a mobile gamer, frequently stream video content, or simply want a phone that can handle demanding tasks without breaking the bank. Its superior processing power and faster charging make it ideal for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 732G in the Poco X3 NFC handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 732G is specifically designed for gaming. It can comfortably run PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. The 8nm process also helps to minimize thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a consistent experience.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo Reno4 F with its 18W charger?
Given the Reno4 F’s 18W charging, a full charge from 0% is likely to take between 2 to 2.5 hours. This is significantly slower than the Poco X3 NFC’s 65-minute full charge time, making it less convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the NFC functionality on the Poco X3 NFC reliable for mobile payments?
Yes, the NFC on the Poco X3 NFC is fully functional and reliable for contactless payments using services like Google Pay. Xiaomi has a good track record of implementing NFC correctly in their devices.
❓ Does the Helio P95 in the Oppo Reno4 F struggle with multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously?
While the Helio P95 is a capable processor, it can exhibit some slowdowns when handling a large number of apps simultaneously. The Poco X3 NFC’s Snapdragon 732G, with its more efficient architecture and higher clock speeds, provides a smoother multitasking experience.
