The Oppo Reno4 F and Realme 7 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving it. The Reno4 F leans on a more established, if slightly older, Mediatek chipset, while the Realme 7 Pro champions Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 720G and a blazing-fast 65W charging solution. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 7 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset, built on a more efficient 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge, and the 65W charging is a game-changer. While the Reno4 F is still a capable device, the 7 Pro offers a more future-proof and convenient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, September 03. Released 2020, September 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 160.9 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 34 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Mirror Blue, Mirror Silver |
| Models | SPH2209 | RMX2170 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 0.52 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 3,498,000 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 278414(v8)
GeekBench: 1811 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 F
- Potentially more refined software experience with ColorOS.
- Slightly lower price point (depending on market).
- Decent battery endurance.
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P95).
- Significantly slower charging (18W).
- Likely lower peak display brightness.
Realme 7 Pro
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset.
- Blazing-fast 65W charging.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users.
- Potentially slightly higher price.
- No information on OIS
Display Comparison
The Realme 7 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits, compared to the Reno4 F’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both devices feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating a typical IPS panel. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for everyday use, especially for media consumption. While both likely utilize a 60Hz refresh rate (not specified in the data), the brighter panel on the Realme 7 Pro provides a more vibrant viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor. The Realme 7 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which is known for its excellent image processing capabilities. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Snapdragon 720G’s ISP gives the Realme 7 Pro a potential edge in image quality and video stabilization. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 7 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) is architecturally superior to the Oppo Reno4 F’s Mediatek Helio P95 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 720G results in improved thermal efficiency and power consumption, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 720G’s Kryo 465 Gold cores, clocked at 2.3 GHz, also offer a slight clock speed advantage over the Reno4 F’s Cortex-A75 cores (2.2 GHz). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Realme 7 Pro.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a massive advantage. It can charge from 0% to 50% in just 12 minutes and reach 100% in 34 minutes. The Oppo Reno4 F’s 18W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to fully charge. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts the user experience, making the Realme 7 Pro far more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 F if you prioritize a slightly more refined software experience (typical of Oppo’s ColorOS) and are less concerned with raw performance or extremely fast charging. Buy the Realme 7 Pro if you value performance for gaming and demanding apps, and if minimizing charging downtime is a top priority. The 7 Pro is the better option for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 7 Pro handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is well-equipped to handle PUBG Mobile at high settings. The Adreno 618 GPU provides sufficient graphical power, and the 8nm process helps prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions. Expect a consistently smooth and enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much of a difference does the 65W charging on the Realme 7 Pro make in real-world use?
The 65W charging is a game-changer. Being able to go from 0% to 50% in 12 minutes and fully charge in 34 minutes significantly reduces downtime. This is particularly useful for users who frequently forget to charge overnight or need a quick power boost before heading out.
❓ Is the difference between the Helio P95 and Snapdragon 720G noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both chips are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 720G offers a snappier and more responsive experience. App loading times are faster, multitasking is smoother, and animations feel more fluid. The difference is subtle but noticeable, especially when switching between apps.
❓ What type of charging protocol does the Oppo Reno4 F use with its 18W charging?
The Oppo Reno4 F utilizes standard USB Power Delivery (USB-PD) for its 18W charging. While compatible with many chargers, it won't benefit from the faster charging speeds offered by proprietary protocols like VOOC or SuperVOOC found on some other Oppo devices.
