Oppo Reno4 F vs Reno5 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown

Choosing between the Oppo Reno4 F and Reno5 5G can be tough. Both offer stylish designs and capable cameras, but cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses, helping you make the right decision for your budget and priorities.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Oppo Reno5 5G is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Snapdragon 765G chipset, 5G connectivity, and blazing-fast 65W charging. While the Reno4 F is more affordable, the Reno5 5G's superior performance and features justify the price difference for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno4 F Oppo Reno5 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China
Launch
Announced2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 162020, December 10
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, January 07
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back-
Dimensions160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in)159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight164 g (5.78 oz)172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak)AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm)
GPUPowerVR GM9446Adreno 620
OSAndroid 10, ColorOS 7.2Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)No
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 2.1UFS 2.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR
Selfie camera
Dual16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)-
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single-32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 4300 mAh
Misc
ColorsMatte Black, Metallic WhiteGalactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black
ModelsSPH2209PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145
PriceAbout 250 EURAbout 160 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 109h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -30.4 LUFS (Below average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno4 F

  • More affordable
  • Large display
  • Decent camera

  • Slower processor
  • No 5G
  • Slow charging (18W)

Oppo Reno5 5G

  • Faster Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset
  • 5G connectivity
  • Blazing-fast 65W charging
  • Brighter display

  • More expensive
  • Potentially slightly larger size

Display Comparison

The Reno5 5G's display shines with a measured 634 nits of peak brightness, offering better visibility in sunlight. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno4 F's display is likely good, but lacks the documented brightness and contrast figures of the Reno5 5G. Overall, the Reno5 5G has a noticeable edge.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno5 5G likely benefits from the Snapdragon 765G's image signal processor (ISP) for improved image processing. While specific camera specs are not detailed, the Reno5 5G's overall processing power suggests slightly better photo and video quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions.

Performance

Here's where the Reno5 5G truly pulls ahead. The Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Helio P95 in the Reno4 F. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno5 5G. The 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.

Battery Life

Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 109 hours. However, the Reno5 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 35 minutes – a stark contrast to the Reno4 F's 18W charging.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Reno4 F is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and decent camera performance without needing 5G. The Oppo Reno5 5G is perfect for those seeking a faster processor, 5G connectivity, and incredibly quick charging, even if it means spending a bit more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Oppo Reno5 5G worth the extra cost?
Yes, if you value performance, 5G connectivity, and fast charging. The Reno5 5G offers a significantly better user experience.
❓ Can the Oppo Reno4 F handle gaming?
It can handle casual games, but demanding titles may experience lag or reduced frame rates due to the less powerful chipset.