Choosing between the Oppo Reno4 F and Reno5 5G can be tough. Both offer stylish designs and capable cameras, but cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses, helping you make the right decision for your budget and priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 5G is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Snapdragon 765G chipset, 5G connectivity, and blazing-fast 65W charging. While the Reno4 F is more affordable, the Reno5 5G's superior performance and features justify the price difference for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | SPH2209 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 109h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.4 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 317762(v8)
GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 F
- More affordable
- Large display
- Decent camera
- Slower processor
- No 5G
- Slow charging (18W)
Oppo Reno5 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Brighter display
- More expensive
- Potentially slightly larger size
Display Comparison
The Reno5 5G's display shines with a measured 634 nits of peak brightness, offering better visibility in sunlight. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno4 F's display is likely good, but lacks the documented brightness and contrast figures of the Reno5 5G. Overall, the Reno5 5G has a noticeable edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno5 5G likely benefits from the Snapdragon 765G's image signal processor (ISP) for improved image processing. While specific camera specs are not detailed, the Reno5 5G's overall processing power suggests slightly better photo and video quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
Here's where the Reno5 5G truly pulls ahead. The Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Helio P95 in the Reno4 F. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno5 5G. The 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 109 hours. However, the Reno5 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 35 minutes – a stark contrast to the Reno4 F's 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno4 F is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and decent camera performance without needing 5G. The Oppo Reno5 5G is perfect for those seeking a faster processor, 5G connectivity, and incredibly quick charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno5 5G worth the extra cost?
Yes, if you value performance, 5G connectivity, and fast charging. The Reno5 5G offers a significantly better user experience.
❓ Can the Oppo Reno4 F handle gaming?
It can handle casual games, but demanding titles may experience lag or reduced frame rates due to the less powerful chipset.