Oppo Reno4 F vs Reno5 4G: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Choosing between two similar smartphones can be tough. The Oppo Reno4 F and Reno5 4G both offer stylish designs and decent features, but they cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down the key differences to help you make an informed decision.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Oppo Reno5 4G is the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 720G chipset, vastly superior 50W charging, and improved overall performance. While the Reno4 F is more budget-friendly, the Reno5 4G delivers a much smoother and more modern user experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno4 F Oppo Reno5 4G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Launch
Announced2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 162020, December 31
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, January 09
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back-
Dimensions160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in)159.1 x 73.3 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight164 g (5.78 oz)171 g (6.03 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)
Size6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak)AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
GPUPowerVR GM9446Adreno 618
OSAndroid 10, ColorOS 7.2Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS, HDR
Selfie camera
Dual16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)-
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single-44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/120fps, 720p@240fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS
RadioFM radioUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired50W wired, 100% in 48 min Reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 4310 mAh
Misc
ColorsMatte Black, Metallic WhiteGalactic Silver (Fantasy Silver), Starlight Black (Starry Black)
ModelsSPH2209CPH2159
PriceAbout 250 EURAbout 310 EUR

Oppo Reno4 F

  • More affordable
  • Sleek design
  • Decent AMOLED display
  • Good value for money

  • Slower processor
  • Slow charging
  • Mediocre camera performance compared to Reno5 4G
  • Older chipset

Oppo Reno5 4G

  • Faster processor (Snapdragon 720G)
  • 50W fast charging
  • Improved camera quality
  • More modern design
  • Better performance

  • More expensive
  • May have slightly less RAM in some configurations

Display Comparison

Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution. While the color accuracy and viewing angles are generally good on both, the Reno5 4G might offer slightly better brightness and color vibrancy due to potential panel improvements. The Reno5 4G also has a slightly smaller punch-hole camera, resulting in a marginally less intrusive display.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature a quad-camera setup. The Reno4 F typically has a 48MP main sensor, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth sensor. The Reno5 4G often boasts a 64MP main sensor, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the Reno5 4G's improved sensor and image processing algorithms generally result in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Video recording capabilities are also slightly better on the Reno5 4G.

Performance

The Reno5 4G's Snapdragon 720G chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Reno4 F's Helio P95. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Reno5 4G. The 8nm manufacturing process also contributes to better power efficiency.

Battery Life

The Reno4 F has a 4025mAh battery with 18W charging. The Reno5 4G features a 4500mAh battery and a blazing-fast 50W charging, capable of fully charging the device in around 48 minutes. This is a significant advantage for the Reno5 4G, offering much faster top-ups and potentially longer battery life despite the slightly larger battery.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Reno4 F is a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize a sleek design and don't demand top-tier performance. The Oppo Reno5 4G is ideal for those seeking a faster processor, quicker charging, and a more premium feel, even if it means spending a bit more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Oppo Reno5 4G worth the extra money?
Yes, if performance and charging speed are important to you. The Snapdragon 720G and 50W charging make a significant difference in the user experience.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have decent battery life, the Reno5 4G's larger battery and more efficient chipset give it a slight edge, especially when considering the faster charging.