Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. But with multiple models, choosing the right one can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison pits the Oppo Reno4 F against the Oppo Reno4 Pro, dissecting their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro is the clear winner, boasting significantly faster charging, a brighter display, and a more powerful chipset. While the Reno4 F offers a more budget-friendly option, the Pro's premium features and performance justify the higher price for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia Pacific |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, July 31. Released 2020, August 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, GNSS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Starry Night, Silky White |
| Models | SPH2209 | CPH2109 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 390 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 96h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.8 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 261359 (v8)
GeekBench: 1781 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 F
- More affordable
- Large display
- Decent camera
- Slower performance
- Slow charging
- Less bright display
Oppo Reno4 Pro
- Faster performance
- Significantly faster charging
- Brighter display
- Likely better camera
- More expensive
- Potentially larger size/weight
Display Comparison
The Reno4 Pro's display is a standout feature. Its 843 nits max brightness provides excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a significant advantage over the Reno4 F. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno4 F's display is adequate but lacks the Pro's punch and outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Reno4 Pro likely has superior image processing and potentially better hardware (sensor size, aperture) leading to better low-light performance and overall image quality. Details on specific camera specs are limited, but the Pro's chipset typically supports more advanced camera features.
Performance
The Snapdragon 720G in the Reno4 Pro offers a noticeable performance boost over the Helio P95 in the Reno4 F. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Pro. The 8nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Reno4 Pro's 65W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly quick top-ups compared to the Reno4 F's 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno4 F is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a decent camera and a large display for media consumption. The Oppo Reno4 Pro is for those who demand flagship-level performance, fast charging, and a superior camera experience, and are willing to pay a premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno4 Pro worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize performance, fast charging, and a superior display, the Reno4 Pro is definitely worth the investment. However, if you're on a tighter budget and primarily need a phone for basic tasks, the Reno4 F is a viable option.
❓ What chipset does each phone use?
The Oppo Reno4 F uses a Mediatek Helio P95, while the Oppo Reno4 Pro utilizes a Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. The Snapdragon 720G offers significantly better performance.
