Oppo Reno4 F vs Oppo Reno3: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno3 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 30W charging and slightly improved chipset. While the Reno4 F is a solid contender, the Reno3's charging speed and overall performance edge make it the better choice for most users, especially those valuing quick top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 F | Oppo Reno3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 - APAC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, March 17. Released 2020, March 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4 |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 44 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 73 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Midnight Black, Aurora Blue, Sky White |
| Models | SPH2209 | CPH2043 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Oppo Reno4 F
- Sleek and stylish design
- Decent camera performance
- Good value for money
- AMOLED Display
- Slower charging speed
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Limited availability in some regions
Oppo Reno3
- Faster 30W charging
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Good camera performance
- AMOLED Display
- Potentially higher price
- Design may be less distinctive than Reno4 F
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution. While the color accuracy and viewing angles are generally excellent on both, the Reno3 might have a slightly brighter panel, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. However, the difference is likely minimal.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a quad-camera setup. The Reno4 F typically has a 48MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide, a 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor. The Reno3 also has a similar setup, potentially with slightly different sensor sizes or image processing algorithms. Expect comparable image quality in most scenarios, with both phones capable of capturing detailed photos in good lighting. Low-light performance is likely similar as well.
Performance
The Reno3 boasts the Mediatek Helio P90, a slightly more advanced chipset compared to the Reno4 F's Helio P95. While both are Octa-core processors, the P90 generally offers a bit more processing power, resulting in smoother performance during demanding tasks and gaming. Expect slightly faster app loading times and better multitasking on the Reno3.
Battery Life
This is where the Reno3 truly shines. It features 30W VOOC fast charging, allowing it to charge 50% in just 30 minutes and 100% in 73 minutes. The Reno4 F, with its 18W charging, takes considerably longer to reach a full charge. The Reno3 also likely has a slightly larger battery capacity, further contributing to its advantage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno4 F is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a sleek design and decent camera capabilities. The Oppo Reno3 is better suited for those who need faster charging and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.