Both the Oppo Reno3 Youth and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G target the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G market. While both offer 5G connectivity at a relatively accessible price point, they diverge in their core processing power and charging strategies. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially longer software support, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G emerges as the better choice. Its 33W charging significantly reduces downtime, and Xiaomi's track record suggests more consistent updates than Oppo in this segment. However, the Reno3 Youth's Snapdragon 765G offers a slight performance edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 08. Released 2020, February 14 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Gold | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | PCLM50 | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 370 EUR |
Oppo Reno3 Youth
- Slightly more powerful CPU for peak tasks
- Snapdragon 765G offers good all-around performance
- Potentially better single-core performance
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- 7nm process less efficient than 8nm
- Potentially shorter software support lifecycle
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient 8nm Snapdragon 750G
- Potentially longer software support from Xiaomi
- Slightly lower peak CPU clock speed
- May throttle slightly more under sustained load (though 8nm helps)
- Image processing may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processors. Display quality is likely similar, leaning towards adequate for the price point. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this market segment. Color accuracy will likely be tuned for vibrancy rather than professional accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards versatility. The image processing style will likely differ – Oppo often favors brighter, more saturated images, while Xiaomi tends towards a more natural look. The Snapdragon 765G and 750G both include capable ISPs, but the overall image quality will depend heavily on sensor size and lens quality, data not provided. We can assume both will offer acceptable performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be the key differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 Youth utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, fabricated on a 7nm process. This chip features a Kryo 475 Prime core clocked at 2.4GHz, indicating a focus on single-core performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, however, employs the Snapdragon 750G, built on a more efficient 8nm process. While the 750G has a slightly lower peak clock speed (2.2GHz on its Kryo 570 cores), the 8nm process and newer architecture generally translate to better sustained performance and thermal efficiency. This means the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is less likely to throttle under prolonged load, benefiting gamers and multi-taskers. The 765G's advantage lies in its slightly more powerful single-core performance, potentially offering a snappier experience in less demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s 33W charging is a significant advantage. Achieving a full charge in 58 minutes is considerably faster than the Reno3 Youth’s 30W charging, which only reaches 50% in 20 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 750G contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference. This means the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is likely to offer comparable, if not better, real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Youth if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications and occasional gaming, and are comfortable with potentially slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you value fast charging, efficient power management, and a potentially longer software support lifecycle, even if it means a slight compromise in peak CPU performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 750G is surprisingly capable for mid-range gaming. While it won't match flagship performance, it can handle PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 8nm process helps prevent significant throttling, ensuring a consistent gaming experience over extended periods.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compared to the 30W charging on the Oppo Reno3 Youth in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G can reach 100% charge in approximately 58 minutes, while the Reno3 Youth only reaches 50% in 20 minutes. This means a full charge on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G takes less than 30 minutes longer to reach full capacity from 50%, offering a much quicker turnaround time for users who need to top up quickly.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in the Oppo Reno3 Youth support Wi-Fi 6, and if so, is it a significant advantage?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G does support Wi-Fi 6. This offers faster wireless speeds and improved network efficiency, especially in congested environments with multiple connected devices. However, to fully benefit from Wi-Fi 6, you'll also need a Wi-Fi 6-compatible router.
