The Oppo Reno3 Youth and vivo V19 Neo represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take distinctly different approaches to achieving that goal. The Reno3 Youth leverages a newer 5G-capable chipset, while the V19 Neo opts for a more established, though less powerful, processor. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Reno3 Youth is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the vivo V19 Neo’s Snapdragon 675, and the faster 30W charging is a welcome addition. While the V19 Neo offers a respectable experience, it falls behind in processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 08. Released 2020, February 14 | 2020, June 13. Released 2020, June 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Gold | Admiral Blue, Crystal White |
| Models | PCLM50 | - |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 320 EUR |
Oppo Reno3 Youth
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 765G)
- Faster 30W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be slightly more expensive
vivo V19 Neo
- Potentially longer battery life under light use
- More affordable price point
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower Snapdragon 675 processor
- Slower 18W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Vivo provided display specs in the context data. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature LCD panels with FHD+ resolution. The Reno3 Youth’s stronger processor could potentially drive a higher refresh rate display if one were included, offering smoother scrolling and animations. The V19 Neo, with its less powerful chipset, would likely struggle to maintain a consistently high refresh rate without impacting battery life. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Reno3 Youth’s more powerful processor allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 765G is more advanced, enabling features like faster autofocus and improved low-light performance. It’s reasonable to assume both phones include a standard set of lenses (main, ultrawide, depth), but the Reno3 Youth’s processing capabilities give it an edge in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 Youth’s Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G, built on a 7nm process, significantly outperforms the vivo V19 Neo’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 765G’s Kryo 475 cores – a prime, gold, and silver configuration – offer a more sophisticated architecture and higher clock speeds (up to 2.4GHz) compared to the 675’s Kryo 460 cores (max 2.0GHz). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers will particularly benefit from the Reno3 Youth’s superior GPU.
Battery Life
The vivo V19 Neo’s 18W charging is noticeably slower than the Oppo Reno3 Youth’s 30W charging. The Reno3 Youth can achieve a 50% charge in just 20 minutes, a significant time saver. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 675’s lower power consumption in the V19 Neo might result in slightly longer battery life under light usage. However, the Reno3 Youth’s faster charging mitigates this advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Youth if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and want the benefits of 5G connectivity. This phone is ideal for users who plan to keep their device for several years and want a future-proof experience. Buy the vivo V19 Neo if you prioritize a slightly more conservative approach, focusing on reliable performance for everyday tasks and a potentially longer battery life due to the less power-hungry chipset. It’s a good choice for users on a tighter budget who don’t require cutting-edge performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V19 Neo struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require reduced graphics settings and frame rates to achieve a playable experience in demanding games. Expect occasional frame drops and potential stuttering, especially during intense action sequences. The Reno3 Youth’s Snapdragon 765G offers a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Oppo Reno3 Youth compared to the 18W charging on the vivo V19 Neo in real-world use?
The Reno3 Youth’s 30W charging can add approximately 50% battery charge in just 20 minutes, while the V19 Neo’s 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely closer to 45-60 minutes to reach the same level. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno3 Youth's 5G capability actually matter if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Currently, limited 5G coverage may not make the Reno3 Youth’s 5G capability immediately impactful. However, investing in a 5G-enabled phone like the Reno3 Youth future-proofs your device, allowing you to take advantage of faster speeds as 5G networks expand. The Snapdragon 765G also offers improved 4G performance compared to the Snapdragon 675.
