Oppo Reno3 Youth vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, combined with a class-leading 1870 nit display and significantly faster 68W charging, outweighs the Reno3 Youth’s slightly older, but still capable, Snapdragon 765G.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 Youth | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 08. Released 2020, February 14 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Gold | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | PCLM50 | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
Oppo Reno3 Youth
- Potentially lower price point
- Proven reliability (established model)
- 5G connectivity
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 765G)
- Slower charging (30W)
- Likely dimmer display
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Brighter display (1870 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, 4nm)
- Faster charging (68W wired, 15W wireless)
- Longer battery life (10:05h active use)
- Potentially higher price
- Newer model – less long-term reliability data
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1870 nits. This is a substantial leap over what we’d expect from the Reno3 Youth, which likely falls in the 400-600 nit range based on its market positioning. The higher brightness translates to vastly improved outdoor visibility. While panel technology isn’t specified, the brightness alone makes the Motorola a clear winner for users who frequently use their phones in sunlight. We can assume the Reno3 Youth uses an LCD panel, while the Moto G Stylus 5G may utilize AMOLED for better contrast.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Reno3 Youth, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given its market segment, it likely features a standard multi-camera setup with a primary sensor around 48MP. The Motorola’s camera performance will depend heavily on its main sensor and image processing algorithms, which are not provided. The absence of information on OIS for either device suggests both rely primarily on software stabilization. Users prioritizing camera quality should seek detailed reviews of both devices before making a decision.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant difference lies. The Motorola utilizes the Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, fabricated on a 4nm process. This offers a substantial efficiency gain over the Oppo’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Motorola’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.4 GHz) represent a more modern architecture than the Kryo 475 cores in the Reno3 Youth. This translates to better sustained performance and improved power efficiency, particularly in demanding tasks. The Reno3 Youth’s CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) is optimized for a balance of performance and efficiency, but the newer architecture of the Motorola gives it an edge.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:05 hours of active use. This, combined with its 68W wired charging (and 15W wireless), provides a significant advantage over the Reno3 Youth’s 30W wired charging. While the Reno3 Youth’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Motorola’s longer runtime suggests a more efficient combination of hardware and software optimization. The 68W charging allows for a much faster 0-100% charge, potentially taking under 40 minutes, while the Reno3 Youth’s 30W charging takes approximately 20 minutes to reach 50%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Youth if you prioritize a proven track record and are seeking a functional 5G phone at the absolute lowest possible price point. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you value a brighter, more modern display, faster charging speeds, and a more efficient processor for extended battery life, even if it means spending a bit more.