Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of 5G Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth daily experience and efficient battery life, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a significant performance uplift, and the faster 50W charging mitigates any battery life concerns, despite similar endurance ratings.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 40, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Starry Night, Sunrise, Classic Blue | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | PCRM00, PCRT00, CPH2009 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.82 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
- Sleek and stylish design
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 765G for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor compared to the Mi 10 Pro
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Flagship Snapdragon 865 performance
- Significantly faster 50W wired charging
- Potentially superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G boasts a notably brighter panel at 858 nits, compared to the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G’s 819 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology (implied by contrast ratio), the Mi 10 Pro’s higher brightness provides a more vibrant and readable outdoor experience. The lack of refresh rate data for both phones means we can't assess smoothness, but the Mi 10 Pro's overall display quality is slightly superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. Given the Mi 10 Pro’s flagship positioning, it likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The absence of specific details prevents a precise comparison, but Xiaomi’s history suggests a focus on high-resolution sensors and computational photography. The Reno3 Pro, while capable, likely prioritizes a more balanced camera experience without the same level of advanced features. Without sensor size or aperture data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Mi 10 Pro likely holds an advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 865 features a newer Cortex-A77 CPU core architecture and a more powerful Adreno 650 GPU, resulting in significantly faster processing speeds and improved graphics performance. The Mi 10 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) is demonstrably more potent than the Reno3 Pro’s (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing, heavy multitasking, and graphically intensive games. While both support 5G, the 865’s modem offers potentially faster and more reliable connectivity.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of approximately 100-101 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life. However, the charging capabilities are vastly different. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G supports 50W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in under 30 minutes, alongside 30W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging. The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G is limited to 30W wired charging, taking slightly longer to reach a similar charge level. This faster charging speed on the Mi 10 Pro is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G if you prioritize a sleek design, a more manageable price point, and a balanced experience for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you demand top-tier performance for demanding applications, gaming, and benefit from significantly faster charging speeds and potentially better camera capabilities.