Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G vs Sony Xperia 1 III: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range and Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and all-day battery life, the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G remains a solid choice. However, the Sony Xperia 1 III delivers a significantly more powerful experience with its Snapdragon 888, superior display, and advanced camera features, making it the clear winner for demanding users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 40, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Starry Night, Sunrise, Classic Blue | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | PCRM00, PCRT00, CPH2009 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| SAR EU | 0.82 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
- Excellent battery life (100h endurance)
- Brighter display (819 nits)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 765G)
- Limited camera features compared to flagship rivals
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Advanced camera system with superior ISP
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Shorter battery life (82h endurance)
- Lower peak display brightness (620 nits)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 III features a display with a measured peak brightness of 620 nits, significantly lower than the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G’s 819 nits. While both boast an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the Reno3 Pro 5G’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Xperia 1 III, however, benefits from Sony’s expertise in display technology, likely offering more accurate color reproduction, though this isn't explicitly stated in the provided data. The Reno3 Pro 5G’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the Xperia 1 III’s flagship status suggests a more sophisticated camera system. While specific sensor details are missing, the Snapdragon 888’s image signal processor (ISP) is far more advanced than the 765G’s, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and video stabilization. The Xperia 1 III likely features a larger main sensor and more versatile lens options, catering to professional photographers and videographers. The Reno3 Pro 5G’s camera is likely competent for everyday use, but will fall short in challenging lighting conditions or when demanding advanced features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm), while the Sony Xperia 1 III is powered by the Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The 5nm process node of the 888 offers superior power efficiency and transistor density, resulting in a substantial performance uplift. The Xperia 1 III’s CPU, featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, significantly outperforms the Reno3 Pro 5G’s Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.4 GHz. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The Xperia 1 III is the clear winner for performance-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G boasts an endurance rating of 100 hours, while the Sony Xperia 1 III manages 82 hours. This suggests the Reno3 Pro 5G offers superior battery life despite having a similar charging speed (30W, 50% in 20/30 minutes respectively). The Xperia 1 III compensates with added charging versatility – supporting PD, wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging – features absent on the Reno3 Pro 5G. The Reno3 Pro 5G prioritizes longevity, while the Xperia 1 III offers convenience and flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G if you need a reliable 5G phone with excellent battery endurance and a bright display for everyday use, all at a more accessible price point. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prioritize top-tier performance for gaming and content creation, demand a professional-grade camera system, and value features like wireless charging and a more premium build quality.