Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Efficiency and Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a smooth, efficient experience, the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G is the better value. However, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G’s superior processing power, particularly the Snapdragon 865 variant, makes it the clear choice for demanding users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - SM-G986B |
| 5G bands | 40, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - SM-G986B |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, February 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) | 161.9 x 73.7 x 7.8 mm (6.37 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M5 & 2x2.50 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - GlobalOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) - USA |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Exynos 990 (7 nm+) - GlobalQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) - USA |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G77 MP11 - GlobalAdreno 650 - USA |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | - |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (telephoto), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 1.1x optical zoom, 3x hybrid zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.0, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (Snapdragon model only; market/operator dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 25W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Starry Night, Sunrise, Classic Blue | Cosmic Black, Cosmic Grey, Cloud Blue, Cloud White, Aura Red, Aura Blue |
| Models | PCRM00, PCRT00, CPH2009 | SM-G986, SM-G986F, SM-G986F/DS, SM-G986U, SM-G986U1, SM-G9860, SM-G986B/DS, SM-G986N, SM-G986B, SM-G986W, SCG02 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 174.17 / C$ 684.99 / € 299.97 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.82 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
- Exceptional battery life (100h endurance)
- Fast 30W wired charging
- Bright and vibrant display (819 nits)
- Mid-range Snapdragon 765G processor
- Less advanced camera system compared to the S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 (USA variant) or Exynos 990 processor
- More versatile and advanced camera system
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potential for thermal throttling (Exynos variant)
- Slower 25W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G boasts a bright display, reaching a measured 819 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even outdoors. While the S20+’s display specifications aren’t provided, Samsung’s flagship displays are renowned for their color accuracy and high peak brightness. The Reno3 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical OLED panel, while the S20+ likely features a higher-quality Dynamic AMOLED panel. The S20+ likely benefits from a higher refresh rate (120Hz) not present in the Reno3 Pro, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. The S20+’s display is likely superior in color accuracy and overall quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but differ in their approach. The Reno3 Pro’s camera is described as ‘Photo / Video’ without specifics, suggesting a versatile setup. The S20+’s camera system, while details are missing, is expected to have a larger main sensor and more advanced features like Space Zoom. The S20+’s image processing is likely more sophisticated, offering better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Reno3 Pro likely relies on software optimization to compensate for its potentially smaller sensor size. The S20+’s inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is almost certain, providing sharper images and smoother video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm), a mid-range 5G processor. Its octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) balances performance and efficiency. The Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G comes in two variants: the Exynos 990 (7nm+) globally and the Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) in the USA. The Snapdragon 865 offers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance than the 765G. The Exynos 990, while powerful, has been known to suffer from thermal throttling under sustained load, a problem less prevalent with the Snapdragon 865. The S20+’s LPDDR5 RAM (spec not provided, but standard for flagships) further enhances performance compared to the Reno3 Pro’s likely LPDDR4X RAM.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G boasts an impressive 100-hour endurance rating, indicating excellent battery life. Its 30W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 20 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G offers 25W wired charging (PD3.0), 15W wireless charging (Qi), and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. While the S20+ offers wireless and reverse wireless charging, the Reno3 Pro’s faster wired charging and superior endurance rating give it an edge in battery performance. The S20+'s larger battery capacity (spec not provided, but typical for flagships) may offset the slower charging speed for some users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G if you need long battery life, a bright and vibrant display for media consumption, and a capable camera system without breaking the bank. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, a more versatile camera system with advanced features, and the prestige of a flagship device.