Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G vs OnePlus 8 Pro: Which 5G Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a significant performance uplift, and the addition of 30W wireless charging adds convenience. However, the Reno3 Pro 5G remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who don't need the absolute fastest processing speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | OnePlus 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 40, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 7, 28, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 78 SA/NSA - IN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, April 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) | 165.3 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm (6.51 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.4, (Color filter camera) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired, 50% in 23 min 30W wireless, 50% in 30 min 3W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4510 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Starry Night, Sunrise, Classic Blue | Glacial Green, Ultramarine Blue, Onyx Black |
| Models | PCRM00, PCRT00, CPH2009 | IN2023, IN2020, IN2021, IN2025 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 310 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.82 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 428.39 |
| 256GB 12GB RAM | - | $ 853.51 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 486.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -23.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 573276 (v8) GeekBench: 3374 (v5.1) GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
- More affordable price point
- Excellent battery endurance (100h)
- Sleek and lightweight design (based on brand reputation)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Missing wireless charging
OnePlus 8 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 865 performance
- 30W wired and wireless charging with reverse wireless
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- Slightly longer charging time to 50% with wired charging (23 mins vs 20 mins)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G and OnePlus 8 Pro feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Reno3 Pro 5G reaches a measured peak brightness of 819 nits, while the OnePlus 8 Pro’s brightness is not specified. This suggests the OnePlus 8 Pro likely offers superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both are likely high-refresh-rate displays (based on brand history), the OnePlus 8 Pro is confirmed to have a 120Hz panel, offering smoother scrolling and animations. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s display is also likely to benefit from more advanced color calibration and potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rate, improving efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The OnePlus 8 Pro, given its flagship positioning, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and more advanced image processing. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, the OnePlus 8 Pro’s price point suggests a higher-quality main sensor and potentially a more versatile ultrawide lens. The Reno3 Pro 5G likely focuses on delivering good image quality in various conditions, but may lack the advanced features and low-light performance of the OnePlus 8 Pro. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s a feature more commonly found on flagship models like the OnePlus 8 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core. The OnePlus 8 Pro, however, boasts the significantly more powerful Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+). Its CPU configuration – a 2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core and three additional Cortex-A77 cores – delivers substantially higher single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The 7nm+ node of the Snapdragon 865 also offers improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s availability with up to 12GB of RAM (vs. unspecified for the Reno3 Pro) further enhances multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of approximately 100-103 hours, indicating comparable battery life. However, the OnePlus 8 Pro offers a more versatile charging solution. Both support 30W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in roughly 20-23 minutes. The OnePlus 8 Pro adds 30W wireless charging (50% in 30 minutes) and 3W reverse wireless charging, providing greater convenience and the ability to charge accessories. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the OnePlus 8 Pro’s faster wireless charging and reverse wireless capabilities provide a clear advantage for users who value these features.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G if you need a sleek, 5G-capable phone with excellent battery endurance and are willing to trade some processing power for a lower price. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the OnePlus 8 Pro if you prioritize uncompromising performance for demanding games, intensive multitasking, and benefit from faster charging speeds (wired and wireless) and the added convenience of reverse wireless charging. It’s the choice for power users and mobile gamers.