Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G vs Google Pixel 5a 5G: A Deep Dive into Battery, Display, and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Google Pixel 5a 5G emerges as the winner. Its 122-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses the Reno3 Pro 5G’s 100 hours, offering a tangible advantage for all-day use. However, the Reno3 Pro 5G’s 30W charging provides a quicker top-up when needed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 40, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Starry Night, Sunrise, Classic Blue | Mostly Black |
| Models | PCRM00, PCRT00, CPH2009 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| SAR EU | 0.82 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
- Faster 30W charging for quick power-ups
- Slightly brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially better thermal management (speculative)
- Lower battery endurance (100 hours)
- Less consistent software updates compared to Pixel
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Superior battery life (122 hours)
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Google’s renowned computational photography
- Slower 18W charging
- Slightly dimmer display compared to Reno3 Pro
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, indicating excellent black levels. However, the Pixel 5a 5G edges out the Reno3 Pro 5G with a measured peak brightness of 861 nits compared to the Reno3 Pro’s 819 nits. This difference, while not massive, translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Both utilize the same Snapdragon 765G chipset for graphics rendering, so gaming experience will be similar, but the brighter screen on the Pixel 5a 5G will be more enjoyable outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific sensor details. This makes a direct comparison difficult. However, Google’s Pixel line is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging software algorithms to produce excellent images even with potentially less impressive hardware. The Reno3 Pro 5G likely relies more on hardware specifications, but without knowing sensor size or aperture, it’s impossible to definitively state which camera is superior. The absence of detail regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is a notable omission.
Performance
Critically, both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G (7nm) chipset, featuring the same octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power is virtually identical. Performance will be comparable for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Thermal management, however, isn’t specified, and could be a differentiating factor. Given the Reno3 Pro’s faster charging, it *may* have a slightly more robust thermal solution, but without testing data, this remains speculative. The identical chipset means RAM speed and architecture are also the same, negating any performance advantage here.
Battery Life
The most significant difference lies in battery endurance. The Pixel 5a 5G boasts a 122-hour endurance rating, a substantial improvement over the Reno3 Pro 5G’s 100 hours. This translates to a full day or more of typical usage on the Pixel 5a 5G. While the Reno3 Pro 5G offers faster 30W wired charging (50% in 20 minutes) compared to the Pixel 5a 5G’s 18W charging with PD2.0, the Pixel’s longer battery life reduces the need for frequent top-ups. The Reno3 Pro’s faster charging is beneficial for users who frequently run out of power, but the Pixel 5a 5G’s longevity is a more consistent advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G if you need faster charging speeds and prioritize a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prefer exceptional battery life, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and a more consistent camera performance thanks to Google’s computational photography.