Launched within months of each other, the Oppo Reno3 5G and Realme X50 5G represent early forays into mainstream 5G connectivity. Both aimed to deliver next-gen speeds at competitive prices, but they took different approaches under the hood. The Reno3 5G leverages Mediatek’s Dimensity 1000L, while the X50 5G opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 765G. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right 5G phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Oppo Reno3 5G edges out the Realme X50 5G thanks to the Dimensity 1000L’s more powerful CPU architecture. However, the X50 5G’s slightly faster charging and potentially more refined software experience make it a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 4.7/2.5 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP9 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Starry Night Blue, Sunrise | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | PCHM30, PDCM00, A001OP | RMX2144 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo Reno3 5G
- More powerful CPU for demanding tasks
- Potentially better long-term software support (Oppo)
- Strong single-core performance
- Slower initial charging speed
- Potential for higher thermal throttling under sustained load
Realme X50 5G
- Faster initial charging speed
- Balanced CPU architecture for sustained performance
- Aggressive pricing (typical of Realme)
- Slightly weaker CPU performance compared to Dimensity 1000L
- Potentially less frequent software updates
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature similar LCD panels given their market positioning, specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable. The focus here is on the internal processing power. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of phones in this price bracket. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device is a notable omission compared to later models.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a depth sensor. The image processing style will differ – Oppo typically aims for vibrant, social media-ready images, while Realme often leans towards a more natural look. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes it impossible to determine a clear winner in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1000L utilizes a 7nm process and features a CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture prioritizes peak CPU performance. Conversely, the Realme X50 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (also 7nm) employs a tri-cluster setup: 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver. The Snapdragon 765G’s architecture is designed for sustained performance and efficiency. The Dimensity 1000L’s Cortex-A77 cores offer a performance advantage in single-core tasks, while the Snapdragon 765G’s more balanced approach may lead to more consistent frame rates in extended gaming sessions. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, impacting memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 30W wired charging, but the Realme X50 5G claims to reach 70% charge in 30 minutes, while the Oppo Reno3 5G hits 50% in 20 minutes. This suggests the X50 5G may have a more aggressive charging curve initially, offering quicker top-ups. Battery capacity is not specified, but the charging speed difference suggests the X50 5G might have a slightly smaller battery, relying on faster charging to compensate.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 5G if you need a phone that excels in CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or demanding mobile games, and you value the potential for longer-term software support from Oppo. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you prioritize quicker top-ups with its faster charging, and prefer Realme’s typically aggressive pricing and UI customizations. Both are excellent choices for early 5G adopters.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1000L in the Oppo Reno3 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1000L is a powerful chip, and while it's built on a 7nm process, sustained high performance can generate heat. The Reno3 5G's thermal management system will be crucial. While we don't have specific thermal testing data, the Snapdragon 765G in the X50 5G's architecture is generally considered more thermally efficient, potentially leading to less throttling.
❓ Does the Realme X50 5G's 30W charging significantly outperform the Oppo Reno3 5G's 30W charging in real-world use?
The Realme X50 5G's claim of 70% charge in 30 minutes versus the Reno3 5G's 50% suggests a more aggressive charging curve initially. This means you'll gain charge faster in the first 30 minutes with the X50 5G, which is beneficial for quick top-ups. However, the overall 0-100% charge time difference may not be substantial.
❓ Which phone is better for running graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Oppo Reno3 5G's Dimensity 1000L has a more powerful GPU, which should translate to higher frame rates and better graphics settings in demanding games like PUBG Mobile. However, the Snapdragon 765G in the Realme X50 5G is still capable, and its more efficient architecture might provide more consistent performance over longer gaming sessions.
