Oppo Reno3 5G vs Oppo Reno5 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 5G emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster 65W charging, more powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset, and brighter display. While the Reno3 5G is a capable device, the Reno5 5G offers a noticeable upgrade in performance and charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 5G | Oppo Reno5 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 4.7/2.5 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP9 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Starry Night Blue, Sunrise | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | PCHM30, PDCM00, A001OP | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.4 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno3 5G
- Sleek design
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Competitive price
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
Oppo Reno5 5G
- Fast 65W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Brighter display
- Reverse wired charging
- Potentially higher price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Reno5 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 634 nits peak brightness, compared to the Reno3 5G. The Reno5 5G also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and better overall image quality. While both offer similar resolutions, the Reno5 5G's superior brightness makes it the clear winner for outdoor visibility and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the Reno5 5G is expected to offer slightly improved image processing and low-light performance due to the Snapdragon 765G's image signal processor (ISP). Both phones likely offer similar camera features like portrait mode and night mode.
Performance
The Reno5 5G's Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Reno3 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 1000L. The Snapdragon 765G offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The Reno3 5G is still capable, but the Reno5 5G handles demanding tasks with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both phones have impressive endurance ratings (109h), suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Reno5 5G's 65W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 35 minutes, compared to the Reno3 5G's 30W charging which takes longer. The Reno5 5G also includes reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up other devices.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno3 5G is a good choice for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a sleek design and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno5 5G is ideal for users who demand faster charging, smoother performance for gaming and demanding apps, and a brighter, more vibrant display.