Oppo Reno3 5G vs Oppo Reno4 Z 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno3 5G boasts faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset, making it a performance pick. However, the Reno4 Z 5G shines with exceptional battery life and a competitive price point. Ultimately, the Reno3 5G is for those prioritizing speed, while the Reno4 Z 5G caters to battery longevity and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 5G | Oppo Reno4 Z 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 4.7/2.5 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, October 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP9 | Mali-G57 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 2 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 18W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Starry Night Blue, Sunrise | Ink Black, Dew White |
| Models | PCHM30, PDCM00, A001OP | CPH2065 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 78h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1284:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 295562 (v8) GeekBench: 2196 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno3 5G
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Slightly More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1000L)
- Stylish Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Battery Life Not as Impressive as Reno4 Z 5G
- Potentially Higher Price
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
- Exceptional Battery Life (78h Endurance Rating)
- Competitive Price
- Good Display Brightness (398 nits)
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly Slower Performance (Dimensity 800)
- Slower Charging (18W)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a similar 1284:1 contrast ratio, indicating excellent black levels and image depth. However, the Reno4 Z 5G measures a slightly higher 398 nits of peak brightness, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Reno3 5G's display is likely comparable, but specific brightness measurements are harder to find. Both likely use AMOLED panels for vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera capabilities are similar, both phones offering Photo/Video functionality. While specific megapixel counts and features are not detailed, both Reno models are known for their capable camera systems. The Reno4 Z 5G may have slightly improved image processing due to its newer chipset, but the difference is likely minimal. Low-light performance is likely comparable.
Performance
The Reno3 5G holds a performance advantage thanks to its Mediatek Dimensity 1000L chipset, which generally outperforms the Reno4 Z 5G's Dimensity 800. The Cortex-A77 cores in the Reno3 5G offer a noticeable speed boost compared to the Reno4 Z 5G's Cortex-A76 cores, especially in demanding applications and games. Expect smoother overall performance on the Reno3 5G.
Battery Life
The Reno4 Z 5G is the clear winner in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 78 hours significantly surpasses what's typically expected. The Reno3 5G's battery life is respectable, but not in the same league. This makes the Reno4 Z 5G ideal for heavy users who need a phone that can last for days on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno3 5G? Users who prioritize faster charging speeds and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming. Who should buy the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G? Those seeking exceptional battery life, a more affordable price, and a sleek design without sacrificing essential features.