OnePlus 8 5G UW vs Oppo Reno3 5G: Which 5G Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the OnePlus 8 5G UW is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 865 chipset. However, the Oppo Reno3 5G offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a more efficient processor and potentially better value, especially if Verizon’s UW network isn’t a primary concern.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 5G | OnePlus 8 5G UW (Verizon) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 66, 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 4.7/2.5 Gbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, April 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 160.2 x 72.9 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 2m for 60 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0, 2-LANE | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired, 50% in 22 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Starry Night Blue, Sunrise | Onyx Black, Polar Silver |
| Models | PCHM30, PDCM00, A001OP | - |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 740 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno3 5G
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 865
- Optimized software and wider app compatibility
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Higher power consumption leading to potentially shorter battery life
- Verizon exclusivity may limit carrier options
- Potentially higher price
OnePlus 8 5G UW (Verizon)
- More power-efficient Dimensity 1000L chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Good overall performance for everyday tasks
- Slightly lower CPU and GPU performance compared to Snapdragon 865
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
- Less optimized software ecosystem
Display Comparison
While specific display specs aren't provided, both phones likely feature AMOLED panels common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Snapdragon 865’s Adreno 650 GPU will deliver a smoother experience with graphically intensive content. The Reno3 5G, while capable, will likely exhibit slightly lower frame rates in demanding games. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting flagship design trends.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given OnePlus’s history, the 8 5G UW likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling faster image capture and better low-light performance. The Reno3 5G will likely focus on software-driven enhancements, but may struggle to match the OnePlus in dynamic range and detail. We can assume both phones will offer a variety of shooting modes, but the OnePlus is likely to deliver more consistent results.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) in the OnePlus 8 5G UW boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Oppo Reno3 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance for the OnePlus. The Snapdragon 865 also benefits from a more mature software ecosystem and optimizations. While the Dimensity 1000L is a strong performer, it generally trails the Snapdragon 865 in benchmarks and real-world sustained performance. Both utilize LPDDR4X RAM, but the Snapdragon's superior GPU and CPU architecture provide a significant advantage.
Battery Life
Both devices offer 30W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in approximately 20-22 minutes. The Reno3 5G takes slightly longer (22 minutes vs 20). While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 865’s higher power consumption will likely result in shorter battery life compared to the more efficient Dimensity 1000L. However, the OnePlus’s faster processing speeds may offset some of this difference during moderate usage. The Dimensity 1000L’s efficiency will be more noticeable during prolonged, less intensive tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 5G if you need a capable 5G phone with a focus on efficient power usage and a potentially lower price point, and aren't heavily invested in Verizon's Ultra Wideband network. Buy the OnePlus 8 5G UW (Verizon) if you prioritize maximum performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and require seamless compatibility with Verizon’s 5G UW infrastructure.