Oppo Reno3 5G vs Nokia 8.3 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Oppo Reno3 5G emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 1000L chipset offers a noticeable edge in CPU and GPU performance. However, the Nokia 8.3 5G provides a more balanced experience with a potentially more refined software experience and a competitive price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 5G | Nokia 8.3 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 4.7/2.5 Gbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 2.4/1.2 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, March 19. Released 2020, September 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 171.9 x 78.6 x 9 mm (6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP9 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Android One |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 64GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.43", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 18W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Starry Night Blue, Sunrise | Polar Night |
| Models | PCHM30, PDCM00, A001OP | TA-1243, TA-1251 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno3 5G
- Faster CPU and GPU performance thanks to the Dimensity 1000L.
- Significantly faster 30W charging.
- Potentially better display quality (historically a Reno strength).
- Software experience may be less clean than Nokia's.
- Potential for higher thermal throttling under sustained load.
Nokia 8.3 5G
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates (Nokia's strength).
- Potentially better power efficiency with the Snapdragon 765G.
- Competitive price point.
- Slower charging speed (18W).
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 1000L.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno3 5G's positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel than the Nokia 8.3 5G. The Reno series historically focuses on display quality, suggesting potentially better color accuracy and peak brightness. The Nokia 8.3 5G, being a more value-focused device, may prioritize cost-effectiveness over display extravagance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a definitive comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role. The Dimensity 1000L includes an integrated ISP capable of handling higher resolution sensors and more complex image processing. The Snapdragon 765G’s ISP is also competent, but may be slightly less capable in demanding scenarios. The Reno series often emphasizes camera features, suggesting Oppo may have invested more in sensor quality and software optimization. The Nokia 8.3 5G likely focuses on delivering a reliable camera experience without pushing the boundaries of innovation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7nm) boasts a CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Nokia 8.3 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) featuring 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. The Dimensity 1000L’s Cortex-A77 cores generally outperform the Kryo 475 Prime in single-core tasks, while the overall CPU configuration suggests a performance advantage for the Reno3 5G in multi-threaded workloads. The Snapdragon 765G’s Adreno 620 GPU is a capable performer, but the Dimensity 1000L’s Mali-G57 MC4 GPU is generally considered to offer superior graphics performance, benefiting gamers and users of graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Nokia 8.3 5G’s 18W wired charging is significantly slower than the Oppo Reno3 5G’s 30W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 20 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Reno3 5G provides a tangible benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Snapdragon 765G is known for its relatively efficient power consumption, potentially offsetting the Reno3 5G’s faster charging with longer battery life during moderate use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 5G if you need a phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of 30W fast charging. Buy the Nokia 8.3 5G if you prioritize a clean Android experience, long-term software support (a Nokia hallmark), and a more conservative, potentially more efficient power profile for everyday use.