Motorola Edge 70 vs Oppo Reno3 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 70 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) offers a more efficient architecture than the Reno3 5G’s Dimensity 1000L (7nm), coupled with significantly faster 68W wired and 15W wireless charging, and impressive battery endurance. While the Reno3 5G remains a capable device, the Edge 70 provides a more modern and refined experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 5G | Motorola Edge 70 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 4.7/2.5 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2025, October 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, October 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 74 x 6 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP9 | Adreno 722 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Si/C Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Starry Night Blue, Sunrise | Pantone: Gadget Gray, Lily Pad, Bronze Green |
| Models | PCHM30, PDCM00, A001OP | XT2601-2, XT2603-2 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | £ 799.00 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 50:14h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class A |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo Reno3 5G
- Potentially lower price point due to age.
- Decent performance for everyday tasks.
- 5G connectivity.
- Older chipset with less efficient architecture.
- Slower charging speeds.
- Likely shorter software support lifespan.
Motorola Edge 70
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 processor.
- Significantly faster 68W wired and 15W wireless charging.
- Excellent battery life (50:14h endurance).
- Likely longer software support.
- Potentially higher price than the Reno3 5G.
- May not offer extreme gaming performance.
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given the Reno3 5G’s release year, it likely features an AMOLED panel with a standard refresh rate. The Motorola Edge 70, being a more recent model, likely boasts a higher refresh rate AMOLED display, potentially with LTPO technology for variable refresh rate and improved power efficiency. Bezels are expected to be slimmer on the Edge 70, reflecting advancements in display manufacturing. Color accuracy is also likely superior on the Edge 70 due to more advanced calibration techniques.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Motorola generally focuses on computational photography, leveraging software algorithms to enhance image quality. The Edge 70 likely benefits from newer image signal processors (ISPs) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, resulting in improved dynamic range and low-light performance. The Reno3 5G’s camera system, while capable for its time, will likely fall behind in image processing capabilities. We can assume both phones have a primary camera, but the Edge 70 likely has a more advanced sensor and lens combination.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 70’s Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) represents a significant leap in efficiency over the Oppo Reno3 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7nm). The 4nm process node allows for higher transistor density and lower power consumption, translating to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While the Reno3 5G’s Cortex-A77 cores offer strong single-core performance, the Edge 70’s Cortex-720 cores, combined with a more modern architecture, provide a more balanced and efficient performance profile. The Edge 70’s CPU configuration (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720, 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720, 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) suggests a focus on sustained performance across all cores.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 70’s battery endurance of 50:14h and active use score of 13:36h are substantial advantages over the Reno3 5G. While the Reno3 5G offers 30W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 20 minutes, the Edge 70’s 68W wired charging is significantly faster. The addition of 15W wireless charging on the Edge 70 provides added convenience. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4’s efficiency further contributes to the Edge 70’s superior battery life, allowing for longer usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 5G if you prioritize finding a significantly cheaper 5G device and are comfortable with older technology. Its Dimensity 1000L still provides adequate performance for everyday tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 70 if you value battery life, faster charging speeds, and a more modern, efficient processor for smoother multitasking and potentially longer software support.