Oppo Reno3 5G vs Huawei nova 7 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more efficient chipset, the Oppo Reno3 5G emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1000L offers a strong CPU package, while the Huawei nova 7 5G excels in charging speed, but potentially at the cost of thermal management.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno3 5G | Huawei nova 7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 4.7/2.5 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | OLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7 nm) | Kirin 985 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP9 | Mali-G77 (8-core) |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 40W wired, 75% in 30 min 5W reverse wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Starry Night Blue, Sunrise | Black, Space Silver, Midsummer Purple, Red, Green |
| Models | PCHM30, PDCM00, A001OP | JEF-TN00, JEF-AN00, JEF-NX9, JEF-AN20 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 390 EUR |
Oppo Reno3 5G
- Strong CPU performance with Dimensity 1000L
- Potentially better thermal management due to chipset efficiency
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks and gaming
- Slower charging speed compared to Huawei nova 7 5G
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
Huawei nova 7 5G
- Ultra-fast 40W charging
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially strong image processing from Kirin 985 ISP
- Potentially higher thermal throttling under sustained load
- CPU architecture may not be as efficient as Dimensity 1000L
Display Comparison
While specific display specs aren't provided, both phones likely feature AMOLED panels common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. The choice of chipset impacts the display's ability to maintain high refresh rates without significant power draw. The Dimensity 1000L's integrated display engine may offer better optimization for smooth visuals. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar market positioning, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 1000L features a capable ISP, but the Kirin 985’s ISP is known for its strong image processing capabilities, particularly in Huawei devices. Expect both phones to deliver good image quality in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance will depend on sensor size and software algorithms. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor would be a significant advantage for either device, but is not specified.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1000L (7nm) utilizes a Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.2 GHz paired with a Cortex-A55 efficiency cluster. The Huawei nova 7 5G’s Kirin 985 5G (7nm) employs a different core configuration: one Cortex-A76 at 2.58 GHz, three more A76 cores at 2.40 GHz, and four A55 cores at 1.84 GHz. While the Kirin 985 boasts a higher clock speed on its primary core, the Dimensity 1000L’s architecture, with its newer A77 cores, generally translates to better sustained performance and efficiency. The Kirin 985’s reliance on multiple A76 cores could lead to higher power consumption under sustained load. Both likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, but the speed and configuration will impact multitasking responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Huawei nova 7 5G takes a clear lead in charging speed with its 40W wired charging, capable of reaching 75% charge in just 30 minutes. The Oppo Reno3 5G’s 30W charging is respectable, achieving 50% in 20 minutes, but noticeably slower. The actual battery capacity isn’t provided, but the faster charging of the nova 7 5G is a significant benefit for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The nova 7 5G also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Reno3 5G, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno3 5G if you need a phone that balances performance and efficiency for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Its Dimensity 1000L chipset provides a solid foundation for multitasking and 5G connectivity. Buy the Huawei nova 7 5G if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly, and are comfortable with potentially warmer operation under heavy load.