Oppo Reno2 vs Motorola Edge 70: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 70 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, delivers a noticeable performance boost and future-proofs the device. While the Reno2 excels in battery endurance, the Edge 70’s 68W charging mitigates battery concerns for many.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno2 | Motorola Edge 70 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, September | 2025, October 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, October 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74.3 x 9.5 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 in) | 159.9 x 74 x 6 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 104.1 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 722 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 | Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (gyro-EIS); video rec. only with main camera | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Si/C Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Luminous Black, Ocean Blue, Sunset Pink | Pantone: Gadget Gray, Lily Pad, Bronze Green |
| Models | PCKM70, PCKT00, PCKM00, CPH1907 | XT2601-2, XT2603-2 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | £ 799.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -92.4dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 67dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 81dB | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 214097 (v7), 261990 (v8) GeekBench: 7001 (v4.4) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 50:14h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class A |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo Reno2
- Exceptional battery endurance (102h)
- Proven reliability of the Snapdragon 730G
- Potentially lower price point due to age
- Slower 20W charging
- Older chipset with less processing power
- Likely lacks modern display features
Motorola Edge 70
- Faster Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset (4nm)
- Significantly faster 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Lower endurance rating (50:14h)
- May be more expensive than the Reno2
- Battery longevity over 1000 cycles is a claim, not a proven fact
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno2’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 509 nits, which is adequate for indoor use but may struggle in direct sunlight. The Motorola Edge 70’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, we can expect comparable brightness. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. However, the Reno2’s age suggests it likely lacks features like adaptive refresh rates found in newer devices like the Edge 70, potentially impacting smoothness during scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Reno2’s age suggests its image processing algorithms are less refined than those found in the Edge 70. The Edge 70 likely benefits from newer computational photography techniques, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details on both phones suggests neither prioritizes a flagship-level camera experience.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 70’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) represents a significant leap over the Oppo Reno2’s Snapdragon 730G (8nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. The Edge 70’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 prime core alongside 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 cores and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520 cores – is architecturally more advanced than the Reno2’s Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Edge 70.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno2 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours, a testament to its efficient chipset and software optimization. However, its 20W wired charging is comparatively slow. The Motorola Edge 70, with its 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging, offers a much faster replenishment rate. While its endurance is rated at 50:14h and an active use score of 13:36h, the rapid charging capabilities mean less downtime. The Edge 70 also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno2 if you prioritize exceptional battery life above all else and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. This phone is ideal for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day without easy access to power outlets. Buy the Motorola Edge 70 if you value a more modern processor, faster charging speeds, and a generally smoother user experience. This is the better option for users who enjoy gaming, streaming, or frequently multitask.