Oppo Reno2 vs Google Pixel 4a 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765G provides a performance edge, and Google’s computational photography elevates its camera above the Reno2. However, the Oppo Reno2 remains a strong contender for those prioritizing exceptional battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno2 | Google Pixel 4a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6, mmWave (market dependant) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, September | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74.3 x 9.5 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 in) | 153.9 x 74 x 8.2 mm (Sub-6) or 8.5 mm (Sub-6 and mmWave) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 168 g (5G Sub-6); 171 g ( 5G Sub-6 and mmWave) (5.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 104.1 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 107˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (gyro-EIS); video rec. only with main camera | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3885 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Luminous Black, Ocean Blue, Sunset Pink | Just Black, Clearly White |
| Models | PCKM70, PCKT00, PCKM00, CPH1907 | GD1YQ, G025I, G025E, G025H, G6QU3 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -92.4dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 67dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 81dB | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 214097 (v7), 261990 (v8) GeekBench: 7001 (v4.4) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno2
- Exceptional battery life (102h endurance)
- 20W fast charging
- Potentially lower price point (due to age)
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 730G)
- Less advanced camera software
- Display may struggle in direct sunlight
Google Pixel 4a 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Google’s superior camera software
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Likely shorter battery life
- 18W charging is slower than Reno2
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno2 features a display capable of reaching 509 nits of peak brightness, which is adequate for indoor use but may struggle in direct sunlight. While the contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), this is typical marketing speak. The Pixel 4a 5G’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it likely offers similar brightness levels. Neither phone is expected to feature high refresh rate panels, focusing instead on efficiency. The Reno2’s display is likely the limiting factor for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the Pixel 4a 5G benefits significantly from Google’s industry-leading computational photography algorithms. While sensor sizes and apertures are not specified, the Pixel’s software processing excels in dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The Reno2 likely relies more on hardware capabilities, and while capable, won’t match the Pixel’s consistently excellent results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The lack of detail regarding the Reno2’s camera features suggests it doesn’t offer a standout advantage in this area.
Performance
The Google Pixel 4a 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) represents a generational leap over the Oppo Reno2’s Snapdragon 730G (8nm). The 7nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better sustained performance and potentially lower temperatures. The Pixel 4a 5G’s CPU configuration – 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver – offers a slight clock speed advantage over the Reno2’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, giving the Pixel 4a 5G a clear edge.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno2 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours, a testament to its efficient chipset and likely optimized software. This translates to multi-day battery life for typical users. The Pixel 4a 5G’s battery capacity is not provided, but its more powerful chipset and 5G connectivity will likely result in shorter battery life. However, the Pixel 4a 5G supports 18W charging with PD2.0, while the Reno2 offers 20W charging. While the difference isn’t massive, the Reno2’s slightly faster charging could offset some of the Pixel’s potential battery life deficit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno2 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use and value long-term battery health. Buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G if you prioritize a clean Android experience, excellent camera performance, and future-proofing with 5G connectivity, even if it means more frequent charging.