The Oppo Reno2 Z and vivo V17 Pro represent a fascinating intersection of mid-range ambition. Both devices aimed to deliver premium features at accessible price points, but they took different approaches to achieve this. The Reno2 Z prioritized processing power with its MediaTek Helio P90, while the V17 Pro focused on a balanced experience with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 and a respectable battery endurance rating. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone offers the best value today.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Oppo Reno2 Z emerges as the better choice. While the vivo V17 Pro boasts comparable battery endurance, the Helio P90’s architecture provides a noticeable edge in demanding tasks, making the Reno2 Z more future-proof.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, September | 2019, September 20. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 159 x 74.7 x 9.8 mm (6.26 x 2.94 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 201.8 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
13 MP, (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Motorized pop-up 8 MP, 17mm (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sky White, Luminous Black | Crystal Black, Crystal Sky, Midnight Ocean |
| Models | PCKM70, PCKT00, PCKM00, CPH1945, CPH1951, PCKM80 | 1909, PD1931F_EX, 1910 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.39 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -94.5dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 89dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 176791 (v7)
GeekBench: 6629 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno2 Z
- Faster charging (20W)
- More powerful processor (Helio P90)
- Potentially better image processing
- Battery capacity unknown
- Potentially less power efficient
vivo V17 Pro
- Excellent battery endurance (107h)
- Measured display brightness (504 nits)
- Efficient Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Slower charging (18W)
- Less powerful processor
Display Comparison
The vivo V17 Pro’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 504 nits, providing adequate visibility outdoors, though it lacks information on panel technology like OLED or IPS. The Reno2 Z’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. However, given the Reno2 Z’s market positioning, it likely features an IPS LCD panel. The V17 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is a marketing term, typical of OLED displays, but the lack of specific panel details leaves its true color accuracy and viewing angles uncertain. Without further data on the Reno2 Z’s display, the V17 Pro holds a slight advantage based on measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the market segment suggests both likely employ similar mid-range camera setups. The Reno2 Z’s focus on processing power *could* translate to better image processing algorithms, potentially enhancing dynamic range and detail. The V17 Pro’s camera performance will likely be adequate for everyday photography, but the Reno2 Z has the potential to deliver slightly more refined results, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility; these sensors often lack the detail and clarity to produce truly compelling macro shots.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno2 Z utilizes the MediaTek Helio P90 (12nm) with its octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), while the vivo V17 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) with an octa-core setup (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver). The Snapdragon 675’s 11nm process node generally offers better power efficiency than the Helio P90’s 12nm node. However, the Helio P90’s Cortex-A75 cores are architecturally more powerful than the Kryo 460 Gold cores, resulting in superior single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother performance in demanding applications on the Reno2 Z. The Reno2 Z’s GPU is also likely to outperform the Snapdragon 675’s Adreno 610, making it the better choice for gaming.
Battery Life
The vivo V17 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Oppo Reno2 Z’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 20W wired charging significantly surpasses the V17 Pro’s 18W charging. This means the Reno2 Z can replenish its battery faster, minimizing downtime. While the V17 Pro may last longer on a single charge, the Reno2 Z’s faster charging mitigates this advantage, especially for users who frequently top up their devices throughout the day. The efficiency of the Snapdragon 675 may contribute to the V17 Pro’s endurance, but the Reno2 Z’s charging speed offers a practical benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno2 Z if you frequently engage in mobile gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value faster charging speeds. Its Helio P90 chipset delivers superior processing power for these scenarios. Buy the vivo V17 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography. The Snapdragon 675 offers a stable and efficient performance profile.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio P90 in the Oppo Reno2 Z get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio P90 is known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 675. While the Reno2 Z likely incorporates thermal management solutions, prolonged gaming at maximum settings could lead to noticeable warming. However, the increased performance may be worth the trade-off for serious mobile gamers.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo V17 Pro slow compared to modern standards?
18W charging is relatively slow by today's standards, where 30W and 65W charging are becoming commonplace. While it's not *extremely* slow, it will take longer to fully charge the V17 Pro compared to devices with faster charging capabilities. The Reno2 Z’s 20W charging offers a modest improvement, but neither is considered fast charging in 2024.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 675 handle multitasking compared to the Helio P90?
The Helio P90’s more powerful CPU cores give it an edge in multitasking, particularly when handling numerous demanding applications simultaneously. The Snapdragon 675 is capable, but the Reno2 Z will likely exhibit less lag and smoother transitions when switching between apps.
