Oppo Reno2 Z vs. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: A Detailed Performance and Feature Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ chipset offers significantly faster processing and graphics capabilities. However, the Oppo Reno2 Z remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who don't demand top-tier performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno2 Z | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, September | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sky White, Luminous Black | Papaya Orange |
| Models | PCKM70, PCKT00, PCKM00, CPH1945, CPH1951, PCKM80 | HD1925 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 800 EUR |
Oppo Reno2 Z
- More affordable price point
- Decent camera system for everyday use
- Sufficient performance for casual users
- Significantly slower processor than the competition
- Slower charging speed (20W)
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 855+
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Likely superior display quality and camera capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger size and weight
- May exhibit some thermal throttling under extreme load
Display Comparison
While specific display specs aren't provided, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, being a flagship, likely features a higher-quality AMOLED panel with a higher refresh rate (90Hz was standard for the 7T Pro) and potentially higher peak brightness compared to the Reno2 Z. The Reno2 Z likely utilizes an AMOLED panel as well, but potentially with a lower refresh rate and peak brightness. Bezels on the 7T Pro 5G McLaren were also likely minimized due to its flagship status. Color accuracy is expected to be good on both, but the 7T Pro 5G McLaren likely has more accurate color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a precise comparison. However, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, as a flagship, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Reno2 Z likely focuses on versatility with multiple lenses, but image quality may not match the 7T Pro 5G McLaren in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is more probable on the 7T Pro 5G McLaren, leading to sharper images and smoother videos. The Reno2 Z may rely more on software processing to compensate for a smaller sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno2 Z’s MediaTek Helio P90 (12nm). The Snapdragon 855+ features a Kryo 485 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, offering significantly faster single-core and multi-core performance. The 7nm process node also translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Helio P90, while capable, is designed for mid-range devices and will struggle with demanding games and applications compared to the Snapdragon 855+. The 7T Pro 5G McLaren will benefit from faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Oppo Reno2 Z’s 20W charging. This means faster top-ups, reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed of the 7T Pro 5G McLaren effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 7nm process of the Snapdragon 855+ also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference. Users who frequently need to quickly recharge their phones will greatly benefit from the 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno2 Z if you need a capable all-rounder for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming, and prioritize value for money. You'll appreciate its decent camera and adequate performance for the price. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prioritize demanding mobile gaming, fast app loading times, and a smoother overall experience, and are willing to pay a premium for flagship-level performance and 5G connectivity.