Honor 20 Pro vs Oppo Reno2 Z: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor 20 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Kirin 980 chipset delivers significantly better performance than the Reno2 Z’s Helio P90, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive gaming experience. While both offer comparable battery endurance, the Honor 20 Pro’s faster 22.5W charging provides a convenience edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno2 Z | Honor 20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, September | 2019, May. Released 2019, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 154.6 x 74 x 8.4 mm (6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~412 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.26 inches, 96.2 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) | Kirin 980 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Magic 2.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.4, 28mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1" 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 22.5W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sky White, Luminous Black | Phantom Blue, Phantom Black, Icelandic Illusion |
| Models | PCKM70, PCKT00, PCKM00, CPH1945, CPH1951, PCKM80 | YAL-AL10, YAL-L41 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -46.8dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 68dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 87dB |
Oppo Reno2 Z
- Potentially lighter and more ergonomic design.
- Competitive price point.
- Adequate performance for everyday tasks.
- Significantly weaker processor compared to the Honor 20 Pro.
- Slower charging speeds.
- Limited performance headroom for demanding applications.
Honor 20 Pro
- Powerful Kirin 980 processor for smooth performance.
- Faster 22.5W charging.
- Higher display brightness and contrast.
- May be slightly heavier than the Oppo Reno2 Z.
- Potentially higher price (depending on current deals).
- Software experience may vary based on region.
Display Comparison
The Honor 20 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 507 nits of peak brightness, providing better visibility outdoors compared to the Reno2 Z (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Honor 20 Pro’s 1222:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. Bezels are comparable, but the Honor 20 Pro’s higher brightness and contrast give it a clear advantage for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details beyond 'Photo/Video' are limited. The Honor 20 Pro likely benefits from the Kirin 980’s superior image signal processor (ISP), enabling better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Honor’s history suggests a focus on image quality. The Reno2 Z’s camera is likely tuned for a more social-media friendly aesthetic. The presence of a dedicated ISP on the Kirin 980 gives the Honor 20 Pro an edge in image processing capabilities.
Performance
The Kirin 980 in the Honor 20 Pro, fabricated on a 7nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Reno2 Z’s 12nm Helio P90. The Kirin 980’s octa-core configuration, featuring two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, significantly outperforms the Reno2 Z’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz in CPU-intensive tasks. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The Honor 20 Pro’s GPU also benefits from the 7nm process, offering superior graphics performance for gaming. The Reno2 Z will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Honor 20 Pro is the clear winner for demanding users.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno2 Z and Honor 20 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Honor 20 Pro’s 22.5W wired charging is significantly faster than the Reno2 Z’s 20W charging, allowing it to reach 50% charge in just 30 minutes. This faster charging speed is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery throughout the day. While both offer all-day battery life, the Honor 20 Pro’s charging speed provides a practical advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno2 Z if you prioritize a lighter, more streamlined design and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media and casual browsing. Buy the Honor 20 Pro if you demand superior performance for gaming, video editing, or running demanding applications, and value faster charging speeds. The Honor 20 Pro is the better option for power users.