Oppo Reno15 vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a slightly more refined experience, the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) is the better choice. Its Dimensity 9000+ chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Reno15’s Dimensity 8450. However, the Reno15’s superior charging speeds and potentially lower price point make it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm (5.95 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Brown, White | Gray, Blue |
| Models | PLW110 | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 570 EUR |
Oppo Reno15
- Significantly faster charging speeds (80W)
- Wider charging protocol support (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 8450)
- Likely less optimized for gaming
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 9000+)
- Superior CPU and GPU performance
- Potentially better camera system
- Slower charging speeds (67W)
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels (data not provided), the focus here isn't display quality. The core difference lies in the processing power driving the visuals. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, but the chipset dictates how efficiently those pixels are rendered. We can assume both offer vibrant colors and good viewing angles, but the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s superior GPU will translate to higher, more stable frame rates in graphically intensive games.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi’s 12 Pro series historically emphasizes camera capabilities. We can infer that the 12 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While the Reno15 will undoubtedly produce good images, the 12 Pro is likely to excel in low-light conditions and offer greater dynamic range. The absence of details on OIS and lens apertures prevents a more granular assessment.
Performance
The Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) holds a clear advantage in processing power. Its Dimensity 9000+ features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.20 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.85 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Reno15’s Dimensity 8450, which utilizes an octa-core configuration clocked at 3.25 GHz, but lacks the higher-tier Cortex-X2 core. The 9000+’s architecture is designed for sustained performance, making it better suited for prolonged gaming sessions and demanding tasks. The Reno15 will be capable, but the 12 Pro offers a more future-proof experience.
Battery Life
The Reno15’s charging capabilities are its standout feature. 80W wired charging, coupled with support for 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS, provides exceptional flexibility and speed. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W wired charging, while still fast, doesn’t match the Reno15’s peak rate. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Reno15’s charging ecosystem allows for quicker top-ups, potentially mitigating a smaller battery size. The Xiaomi 12 Pro relies on PD3.0 and QC4 standards, which are widely compatible but lack the Reno15’s specialized protocols.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 if you prioritize incredibly fast charging – its 80W wired charging and multiple PPS/UFCS standards offer unparalleled flexibility. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value convenience. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you demand the best possible performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. Its Dimensity 9000+ chipset and optimized thermal design deliver a smoother, more responsive experience.