Oppo Reno15 vs vivo X80 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X80 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its proven camera system, coupled with the option of the Dimensity 9000 chipset, provides a more refined and versatile experience. However, the Reno15’s efficient Dimensity 8450 and rapid charging make it a compelling alternative for those prioritizing efficiency and speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 | vivo X80 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2022, April 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2022, April 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back or ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm (5.95 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 164.6 x 75.3 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 215 g / 219 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 730Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom, gimbal OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", AF |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2 (Snapdragon)/ 5.3 (Dimensity), A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (Global)/ 3.2 (China), OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS Reverse wired | 80W wired, 100% in 38 min 50W wireless, 100% in 50 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 6200 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Brown, White | Cosmic Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | PLW110 | V2185A, V2145 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 850 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 79h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
Oppo Reno15
- Faster charging protocol support (UFCS, PPS)
- Efficient Dimensity 8450 chipset
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Likely less advanced camera system
- Unknown battery capacity
- Less established brand reputation in some markets
vivo X80 Pro
- Superior camera system with advanced features
- Choice of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Dimensity 9000
- 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 variant may suffer from thermal throttling
- Potentially higher price
- Larger size and weight
Display Comparison
The vivo X80 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1014 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno15’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. Both devices lack information regarding panel technology (LTPO or not), but the X80 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a high-quality OLED panel. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target the flagship segment. Color accuracy is assumed to be excellent on both, but the X80 Pro’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but the X80 Pro likely holds a significant advantage. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the X80 Pro’s position as a flagship suggests a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing. The Reno15’s camera system is likely very good, but may not match the X80 Pro’s level of detail and dynamic range. The X80 Pro’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is expected to be more advanced, resulting in sharper images and smoother videos, especially in low light. We can safely assume the Reno15 includes a 2MP macro camera, which is often a marketing gimmick with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Reno15 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU clocked at 3.25 GHz. The X80 Pro offers a choice: the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) or the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4nm). The Dimensity 9000 in the X80 Pro has a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (3.05 GHz vs 3.25 GHz) and a more sophisticated core configuration (Cortex-X2, A710, A510) potentially offering a slight edge in multi-threaded tasks. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, ensuring good efficiency. The X80 Pro’s RAM configuration (likely LPDDR5x) is also expected to be faster than the Reno15’s, further enhancing performance. Thermal management will be crucial for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 variant of the X80 Pro, as it’s known to run hotter than the Dimensity 9000.
Battery Life
The vivo X80 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 79 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Reno15’s battery capacity is unknown, the X80 Pro’s 80W wired charging (100% in 38 minutes) is matched by the Reno15. However, the X80 Pro adds 50W wireless charging (100% in 50 minutes) and reverse wired charging, offering greater versatility. The Reno15’s charging suite includes 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS, providing a wider range of charging options, but the X80 Pro’s wireless charging is a key differentiator.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 if you prioritize fast charging speeds (80W wired, plus UFCS/PPS support) and a streamlined user experience with a focus on efficiency. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value a responsive, power-conscious device. Buy the vivo X80 Pro if you demand a more comprehensive camera system with advanced features, and appreciate the flexibility of choosing between Snapdragon and Dimensity silicon. This phone is geared towards photography enthusiasts and power users who need a robust and feature-rich flagship.