Oppo Reno15 vs. Samsung Galaxy S22 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and sustained performance, the Oppo Reno15 emerges as the winner. Its 80W charging significantly outperforms the Galaxy S22’s 25W, and the Dimensity 8450 offers competitive performance with potentially better thermal management. However, the Galaxy S22 retains an edge in brand recognition and software ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 | Samsung Galaxy S22 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm (5.95 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm (5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 167 g / 168 g (mmWave) (5.89 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.1 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS Reverse wired | 25W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Ion 3700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Brown, White | Phantom Black, White, Pink Gold, Green, Graphite, Sky Blue, Violet, Cream, Bora Purple |
| Models | PLW110 | SM-S901B, SM-S901B/DS, SM-S901U, SM-S901U1, SM-S901W, SM-S901N, SM-S9010, SM-S901E, SM-S901E/DS |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 172.63 / C$ 304.00 / £ 186.11 / € 198.01 |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.15 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 85h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 745496 (v8), 881428 (v9) GeekBench: 3682 (v5.1) GFXBench: 69fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno15
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Competitive Dimensity 8450 performance
- Potentially better thermal management
- Reverse wired charging
- Less established brand recognition
- ColorOS may not appeal to all users
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
- Compact and premium design
- Excellent display quality (982 nits)
- Well-established Samsung ecosystem
- Refined camera software
- Slow 25W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling (Exynos variant)
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S22 boasts a measured peak brightness of 982 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight. While the Reno15’s display specs are not provided, Oppo typically utilizes AMOLED panels. The S22’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is a marketing term, but indicative of a high-quality panel. The S22’s smaller 6.1-inch display contributes to its compact form factor, appealing to users who prefer one-handed usability. Without Reno15 display specs, a direct comparison of resolution and refresh rate is impossible, but the S22’s display is a known quantity for excellent color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Both are advertised as having Photo/Video capabilities. The Galaxy S22 likely benefits from Samsung’s extensive image processing algorithms and potentially larger main sensor. The Reno15’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor size and software optimization. Without specific details, it’s difficult to assess the low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities of either device. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant, as image quality is typically poor. The S22’s video recording capabilities are likely more refined, offering features like 8K recording and advanced stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno15’s Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4nm) features an octa-core CPU clocked at 3.25 GHz. The Galaxy S22 comes in two variants: the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) and the Exynos 2200 (4nm). The Snapdragon variant generally outperforms the Exynos, particularly in sustained workloads due to superior thermal efficiency. The S22’s CPU configuration – Cortex-X2, A710, and A510 cores – is designed for a balance of performance and efficiency. However, the Dimensity 8450’s architecture is highly competitive, and its 4nm process node suggests comparable efficiency. The Reno15’s focus on raw clock speed may translate to a slight edge in single-core tasks, while the S22’s more complex core arrangement could benefit multi-threaded applications. The S22’s RAM configuration (likely LPDDR5) is not specified, but the Reno15’s RAM speed is also unknown.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an endurance rating of 85 hours, indicating reasonable battery life. However, its 25W wired charging is significantly slower than the Oppo Reno15’s 80W wired charging. The Reno15 also supports 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS, offering greater charging flexibility. While the S22 offers 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, the Reno15 also supports reverse wired charging. The Reno15’s faster charging speeds mean less downtime, even with a potentially smaller battery capacity (not specified). The S22’s endurance rating suggests it can comfortably last a full day with moderate use, but heavy users may need to top up before the end of the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 if you need blazing-fast charging, prioritize sustained gaming performance, and are comfortable with Oppo’s ColorOS. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G if you prefer a more polished software experience, a well-established brand ecosystem, and value a compact form factor, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and potentially dealing with thermal throttling under heavy load.