Oppo Reno15 vs Realme GT2 Pro: Which Flagship Delivers the Best Performance and Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around usability and incredibly fast charging, the Oppo Reno15 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8450 offers excellent performance, coupled with a versatile 80W charging system. However, power users demanding maximum gaming performance will find the Realme GT2 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm (5.95 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | 6200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Brown, White | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | PLW110 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno15
- Significantly faster and more versatile charging options (80W wired, multiple protocols)
- Potentially better thermal management due to Dimensity 8450's efficiency
- Reverse wired charging for topping up accessories
- Performance may slightly lag behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in peak scenarios
- Camera specifications are unknown, potentially limiting its photographic capabilities
Realme GT2 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers top-tier gaming performance
- Good peak brightness for outdoor visibility
- Established Android experience
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Slower charging speed compared to the Oppo Reno15
- Battery life is comparable despite potentially lower capacity
Display Comparison
The Realme GT2 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 778 nits, providing good visibility outdoors, though Oppo doesn't provide a comparable figure for the Reno15. Both devices feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. Without knowing the Reno15’s panel technology (LTPO or not), it’s difficult to assess power efficiency differences. The GT2 Pro’s display is likely to be more power-hungry at peak brightness, but the Reno15’s panel characteristics remain unknown. Bezels are assumed to be comparable given both phones target a premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without knowing the main sensor resolution, aperture, or OIS implementation, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes a groundbreaking camera system. It’s safe to assume both will offer competent performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno15 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4nm) with an octa-core CPU clocked at 3.25 GHz, while the Realme GT2 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) with a more complex core configuration (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 initially appears more powerful on paper, the Dimensity 8450’s efficiency gains from the 4nm process can mitigate the performance gap, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but specific speeds aren't provided. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Adreno 730 GPU will likely offer a slight edge in graphics-intensive tasks, but the Reno15’s Dimensity 8450’s Mali-G710 MC10 is no slouch.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno15 and Realme GT2 Pro share an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Reno15 supports 80W wired charging, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS, alongside reverse wired charging. The GT2 Pro offers 65W wired charging, reaching 100% in 33 minutes. The Reno15’s wider range of charging protocols and potentially faster overall charging speed give it a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 if you need a phone that can rapidly replenish its battery – its 80W charging is a game-changer for busy users. It’s ideal for those who value a balanced experience with strong performance and a feature-rich software experience. Buy the Realme GT2 Pro if you prioritize peak gaming performance and are willing to manage potential thermal throttling. It’s the better choice for enthusiasts who push their phones to the limit and appreciate a more raw, unadulterated Android experience.