Oppo Reno15 vs. OnePlus 10T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the OnePlus 10T is the winner. However, the Oppo Reno15’s newer Dimensity 8450 offers competitive performance and potentially better efficiency, making it a strong contender for those seeking a balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 | OnePlus 10T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA), Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA), Cat16 1000/150 Mbps, 5G - India |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2022, August 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2022, August 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm (5.95 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163 x 75.4 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS Reverse wired | 150W wired (125W for 110V sockets) |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Brown, White | Moonstone Black, Jade Green |
| Models | PLW110 | CPH2415, CPH2413, CPH2417, CPH2419 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 377.26 / $ 289.88 / £ 330.00 / ₹ 34,198 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1016958 (v9) GeekBench: 3907 (v5.1) GFXBench: 103fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno15
- Newer Dimensity 8450 chipset offers competitive performance.
- Versatile charging options (80W wired, PD, UFCS, PPS).
- Potential for better thermal management and sustained performance.
- Charging speed is significantly slower than the OnePlus 10T.
- Limited camera details make it difficult to assess image quality.
OnePlus 10T
- Blazing-fast 150W wired charging.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides excellent peak performance.
- Established camera software and tuning.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 can run hot and throttle under sustained load.
- Older chipset compared to the Reno15’s Dimensity 8450.
Display Comparison
Both devices offer a good visual experience, but detailed display specs are limited for the Reno15. The OnePlus 10T boasts a measured peak brightness of 819 nits, ensuring good visibility outdoors. While the Reno15’s display details are sparse, it’s likely to be a high-refresh-rate AMOLED panel, common in this price bracket. The OnePlus 10T’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is typical marketing speak for AMOLED technology. Without knowing the Reno15’s panel type or refresh rate, the 10T has a slight edge due to its confirmed brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. The OnePlus 10T likely benefits from OnePlus’s established camera software and tuning. The Reno15’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor and image processing algorithms. It’s safe to assume both will offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be the key differentiator, and currently unknown.
Performance
This is where the core battle lies. The OnePlus 10T’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a tri-cluster architecture with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, designed for peak performance. The Oppo Reno15 counters with the MediaTek Dimensity 8450 (4nm), an octa-core processor clocked at 3.25 GHz. While clock speed isn’t everything, the Dimensity 8450 is generally considered to be very competitive with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, often trading blows in benchmarks. Both utilize a 4nm process, contributing to improved efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to run hotter under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling. The Reno15’s Dimensity chip *may* offer better sustained performance due to superior thermal management, but real-world testing is needed to confirm. Both devices likely feature LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 10T’s standout feature is its 150W wired charging (125W for 110V sockets), capable of fully charging the battery in a remarkably short time. The Oppo Reno15 offers a more varied charging ecosystem with 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS, plus reverse wired charging. While the Reno15’s charging options are versatile, they don’t match the sheer speed of the 10T. Both phones have an endurance rating of 96h, suggesting similar battery life despite potentially different capacities. The 10T’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery life disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 if you need a phone with a modern chipset for sustained performance and are willing to trade some charging speed for potentially better thermal management. Buy the OnePlus 10T if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging available, and demand peak performance for demanding tasks, even if it means potentially more heat under load. The 10T is ideal for power users and gamers.