Oppo Reno15 vs Motorola Edge 30 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and incredibly fast charging, the Oppo Reno15 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8450, coupled with 80W charging, offers a smoother, more efficient experience than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Edge 30 Pro, which can suffer from thermal throttling under heavy load.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 | Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 7, 12, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2022, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2022, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm (5.95 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.1 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Brown, White | Cosmos Blue, Stardust White |
| Models | PLW110 | XT2201-1 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 475.45 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 80h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 941895 (v9) GeekBench: 3658 (v5.1) GFXBench: 78fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno15
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management with Dimensity 8450
- More versatile charging standards (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Battery capacity and display specs are unknown
- Lacks wireless charging
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Established brand recognition
- Good peak brightness (685 nits)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
- Slower wired charging compared to Reno15
- Limited information on camera capabilities
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications beyond the Motorola Edge 30 Pro’s measured 685 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio. Given the Reno15’s positioning, it likely features a high-quality AMOLED panel, but without refresh rate or resolution details, it’s difficult to assess. The Edge 30 Pro’s brightness is respectable, ensuring good visibility outdoors, but the Reno15 may offer a more color-accurate display based on Oppo’s display tuning history. The absence of LTPO on either device suggests neither will dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power saving.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or specific features, a detailed comparison is impossible. However, Motorola typically focuses on computational photography, while Oppo often emphasizes natural color reproduction. The absence of details suggests neither phone boasts a standout camera system, likely targeting a similar mid-range flagship experience. We can assume both will offer capable daylight performance, but low-light capabilities remain unknown.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 30 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known for thermal throttling under sustained load. The Oppo Reno15’s Dimensity 8450 (4nm) utilizes an octa-core configuration clocked at 3.25 GHz. While the Snapdragon has a higher-clocked prime core, the Dimensity 8450’s architecture and 4nm process generally result in better thermal efficiency, translating to more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the specific speed isn't provided.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Pro has an endurance rating of 80 hours, suggesting a reasonably sized battery. However, the actual capacity is not specified. The Reno15’s battery capacity is also unknown, but its charging capabilities are a significant advantage. The Reno15 supports 80W wired charging, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS, offering unparalleled flexibility and speed. The Edge 30 Pro’s 68W wired charging (50% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min) is fast, but slower than the Reno15. The Edge 30 Pro also includes 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Reno15.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 if you need a phone that consistently delivers smooth performance throughout the day, coupled with the fastest charging speeds available. It’s ideal for power users who frequently game, stream, or multitask. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Pro if you prioritize a more recognizable brand and potentially slightly higher peak performance in short bursts, and value the inclusion of 15W wireless charging.