Oppo Reno15 vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed and charging convenience, the Oppo Reno15 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8450 and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip and 23W charging. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s superior camera processing and software experience make it ideal for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm (5.95 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Brown, White | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PLW110 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno15
- Significantly faster charging (80W)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 8450
- Likely more efficient 4nm process
- Camera performance likely lags behind Pixel 6 Pro
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel’s
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Smooth and refined software experience with guaranteed updates
- High peak display brightness
- Slow charging speed (23W)
- Tensor chip may throttle under sustained load
- Less raw processing power compared to Dimensity 8450
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Reno15’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo typically utilizes high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, inherent to OLED technology, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno15’s display technology is unknown, but a key differentiator could be refresh rate and PWM dimming frequency, impacting eye strain for sensitive users. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size (6.71 inches vs. likely around 6.5-6.6 inches for the Reno15) offers a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging the Tensor chip’s AI capabilities. While specific sensor details for the Reno15 are missing, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Reno15’s camera system likely focuses on delivering sharp, detailed images, but may lack the Pixel’s sophisticated software enhancements. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno15 makes a direct sensor comparison difficult, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s established reputation in mobile photography gives it a significant advantage.
Performance
The Oppo Reno15’s Mediatek Dimensity 8450, built on a 4nm process, is designed for peak performance and efficiency. Its octa-core CPU clocked at 3.25 GHz promises swift app launches and smooth multitasking. In contrast, the Google Pixel 6 Pro utilizes Google’s Tensor chip (5nm), prioritizing AI and machine learning tasks. While the Tensor’s Cortex-X1 cores reach 2.80 GHz, the Dimensity 8450’s architecture and newer node suggest a potential edge in sustained performance and thermal management. The Reno15’s likely LPDDR5X RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to a snappier user experience.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno15 and Google Pixel 6 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Reno15’s charging capabilities are dramatically superior, offering 80W wired charging, alongside 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS support. This allows for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired and 23W wireless charging. The Reno15 can likely achieve a full charge in under 30 minutes, while the Pixel 6 Pro takes considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 if you need a phone that can rapidly recharge and handle demanding tasks with ease, making it perfect for power users and gamers. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera capabilities powered by AI, and a focus on computational photography, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and raw processing power.