Oppo Reno15 Pro vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed, charging, and a vibrant display, the Oppo Reno15 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8450 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 6 Pro in these areas. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s superior camera software and AI capabilities make it a compelling choice for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 Pro | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 76.5 x 7.7 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.30 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2772 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS 50W wireless Reverse wired Bypass charging | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Brown, White | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PLV110 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 450 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno15 Pro
- Incredibly fast 80W wired charging
- Powerful Dimensity 8450 chipset for gaming
- Likely vibrant and responsive display
- Camera specs are unknown, making a direct comparison difficult
- Software support may be less consistent than Google's
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera software and image processing
- Seamless Google integration and AI features
- Long-term software support
- Slow 23W wired charging
- Tensor chip can throttle under sustained load
- Lower peak performance compared to Dimensity 8450
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. However, the Reno15 Pro, while lacking a specified peak brightness, likely benefits from Oppo’s display calibration expertise. Both feature infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, typical of OLED panels. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size (6.71 inches vs. Reno15 Pro’s 6.7 inches) offers a more immersive viewing experience, but the Reno15 Pro’s panel technology and potential for higher refresh rates (not specified, but common in this class) could offer smoother animations. The lack of detailed display specs for the Reno15 Pro is a notable omission.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s Tensor chip to deliver exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While the Reno15 Pro’s camera specs are not provided, Oppo typically focuses on high-resolution sensors and vibrant color profiles. The Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The Reno15 Pro may offer more versatility with potential zoom capabilities, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s software algorithms provide a significant edge in overall image quality and consistency. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno15 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno15 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4nm) is built for raw performance, with an octa-core CPU clocked at 3.25 GHz. This contrasts with the Google Pixel 6 Pro’s Google Tensor (5nm) which prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks. While the Tensor’s Cortex-X1 cores reach 2.80 GHz, the Dimensity 8450’s more modern architecture and smaller node size generally translate to superior CPU and GPU performance in benchmarks. The Reno15 Pro’s likely LPDDR5X RAM further enhances its speed advantage. The Tensor chip excels in on-device AI processing, powering features like Magic Eraser and Live Translate, but falls behind in sustained gaming performance due to thermal constraints.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno15 Pro’s 80W wired charging, alongside 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 55W PPS support, is significantly faster than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging with PD3.0. The Reno15 Pro can likely achieve a full charge in under 30 minutes, while the Pixel 6 Pro takes closer to 60-70 minutes. The Reno15 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging, exceeding the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wireless charging. The Reno15 Pro’s bypass charging feature allows direct power delivery to the device, minimizing heat generation during charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 Pro if you need a phone that charges incredibly fast, handles demanding games with ease, and offers a bright, responsive display. It’s ideal for power users and mobile gamers. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a phone with exceptional camera software, seamless Google integration, and a focus on AI-powered features, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and raw processing power.