Oppo Reno15 Pro vs. iPhone 13 Pro Max: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term software support and a refined ecosystem, the iPhone 13 Pro Max remains a strong choice despite its age. However, the Oppo Reno15 Pro delivers exceptional value with its blazing-fast 80W charging and competitive performance, making it ideal for power users who prioritize speed and aren't locked into the Apple ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 Pro | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66 - A2643, A2644, A2645 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2643, A2644 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2641 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 17 | 2021, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 21 | Available. Released 2021, September 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back, stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 76.5 x 7.7 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.30 in) | 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.7 mm (6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 240 g (8.47 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Ceramic Shield glass |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2772 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~450 ppi density) | 1284 x 2778 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Hexa-core (2x3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | iOS 15, upgradable to iOS 26.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM, 1TB 6GB RAM |
| - | NVMe | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6" SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 12 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.9µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.8, 77mm (telephoto), PDAF, 1/3.4", 1.0µm, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.8, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS 50W wireless Reverse wired Bypass charging | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.2 update |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 4352 mAh (16.75 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Brown, White | Graphite, Gold, Silver, Sierra Blue, Alpine Green |
| Models | PLV110 | A2643, A2484, A2641, A2644, A2645, iphone14,3 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | € 423.38 / $ 394.86 / £ 355.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 801691 (v9) GeekBench: 4706 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno15 Pro
- Incredibly fast 80W charging
- Versatile charging standards (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Competitive performance with Dimensity 8450
- Long-term software support may be limited
- Ecosystem less integrated than Apple's
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
- Excellent camera system with ProRes video
- Long-term software updates and ecosystem integration
- Smooth performance and efficient A15 Bionic chip
- Slower charging speeds
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The iPhone 13 Pro Max boasts a 1050 nit peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno15 Pro’s peak brightness isn’t specified, it’s likely lower. The iPhone’s infinite contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, provides deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both devices utilize OLED technology, but the iPhone’s ProMotion adaptive refresh rate (not mentioned in the data, but standard for the model) offers smoother scrolling and animations compared to the Reno15 Pro, which likely operates at a standard 60Hz or 120Hz. The iPhone’s display is also known for its color accuracy, crucial for content creators.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography and videography, but approach it differently. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is renowned for its cinematic mode and consistent image quality across all lenses. While the Reno15 Pro’s camera specs aren’t detailed beyond 'Photo / Video', Oppo typically focuses on computational photography and vibrant color profiles. The iPhone’s larger sensor size (not specified, but typical for the Pro Max) and advanced image processing algorithms provide superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The iPhone’s ProRes video recording capabilities are also a significant advantage for professional videographers. The Reno15 Pro likely offers a more versatile zoom range, but the iPhone’s overall image quality and video features are generally considered superior.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4nm) in the Reno15 Pro and the Apple A15 Bionic (5nm) in the iPhone 13 Pro Max represent different approaches to mobile silicon. While the Dimensity 8450’s octa-core CPU with a 3.25 GHz clock speed appears impressive, the A15 Bionic’s hexa-core architecture, with its Avalanche and Blizzard cores, is optimized for both peak performance and efficiency. The A15’s 5nm process node generally translates to better power efficiency and sustained performance under load. The Reno15 Pro’s 4nm node is competitive, but Apple’s chip design and software integration give it an edge. The iPhone’s LPDDR5 RAM (assumed, based on the model) is likely faster and more efficient than the Reno15 Pro’s RAM, contributing to smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Reno15 Pro). However, the Reno15 Pro’s charging capabilities are a game-changer. Its 80W wired charging, alongside 50W wireless and various PPS/UFCS standards, significantly reduces charging times compared to the iPhone’s 15W wireless (MagSafe/Qi2) and slower wired charging. The Reno15 Pro’s bypass charging feature allows for direct power delivery, minimizing heat generation during gaming. While the iPhone offers excellent battery optimization, the Reno15 Pro’s charging speed is a clear advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 Pro if you need incredibly fast charging, a versatile feature set, and aren't heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem. It’s the perfect phone for users who frequently top up their battery and want a modern Android experience. Buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max if you prioritize a seamless user experience, long-term software updates, and a robust camera system with excellent video capabilities, and are willing to pay a premium for the Apple ecosystem.