Oppo Reno15 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a refined software experience, the Xiaomi 14 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, despite being on a 4nm process, offers a more mature and optimized platform. However, the Reno15 Pro Max’s blistering 120W charging and broader charging protocol support make it a compelling alternative for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 Pro Max | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | - | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~454 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 80mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 13.5W PD, 33W UFCS, 33W PPS 50W wireless Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | - | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | - | About 650 EUR |
Oppo Reno15 Pro Max
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging with multiple protocol support.
- Potentially more power-efficient 3nm Dimensity 9400 chipset.
- Wider range of charging options (wired, wireless, reverse).
- Mediatek chipset may lack the software optimization of Snapdragon.
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load.
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Mature and optimized Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 platform.
- Likely superior thermal management.
- Refined software experience and ecosystem.
- Less versatile charging protocol support.
- Slightly less power-efficient 4nm process.
Display Comparison
While both devices are expected to feature high-quality AMOLED displays, specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing. However, the Reno15 Pro Max’s potential inclusion of LTPO technology, common in Oppo’s Pro models, would offer adaptive refresh rate capabilities for improved battery efficiency. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s display is likely tuned for color accuracy, a hallmark of Xiaomi’s flagship devices. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but real-world testing will determine which offers a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis relies on brand tendencies. Xiaomi flagships typically prioritize large main sensors and computational photography, while Oppo often focuses on versatile zoom capabilities. The Xiaomi 14 Pro is likely to feature a larger main sensor with advanced OIS, emphasizing detail and low-light performance. The Reno15 Pro Max may offer a more flexible camera system with multiple telephoto lenses. Image processing styles will also differ; Xiaomi tends towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look. The absence of information on secondary sensors makes a comprehensive comparison impossible, but the primary sensor and image processing pipeline will be key differentiators.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Oppo Reno15 Pro Max’s Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, theoretically offers superior transistor density and power efficiency compared to the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm). The Dimensity 9400’s CPU configuration – Cortex-X925, X4, and A720 cores – suggests a focus on both peak performance and sustained efficiency. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from years of software optimization and a mature ecosystem. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s CPU, while using slightly older Cortex-X4 and A720 cores, is clocked lower overall, potentially indicating a focus on thermal management. Both devices utilize Octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences and process node size will dictate real-world performance and thermal throttling under heavy load. Both are expected to ship with LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration will impact multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Reno15 Pro Max boasts a significant charging advantage with its 120W wired charging, supporting PD, UFCS, and PPS standards, offering maximum compatibility. The Xiaomi 14 Pro also supports 120W wired charging, claiming a full charge in 18 minutes. However, the Reno15 Pro Max further includes 50W wireless charging, exceeding the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s 50W wireless charging. The Reno15 Pro Max’s support for multiple charging protocols provides greater flexibility for users with different chargers. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Reno15 Pro Max’s broader charging support and faster wireless speeds give it an edge for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 Pro Max if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available, coupled with support for multiple charging standards like UFCS and PPS, and aren't overly concerned with achieving the highest possible benchmark scores. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you prioritize a consistently smooth and responsive user experience, a more established software ecosystem, and a potentially more efficient thermal profile during sustained workloads.