Oppo Reno15 Pro Max vs vivo X100 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and the fastest charging speeds, the Oppo Reno15 Pro Max is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset and 120W charging offer a noticeable edge. However, the vivo X100 Pro counters with excellent battery endurance (13:53h active use) and a potentially superior camera system, making it ideal for content creators and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 Pro Max | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | - | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~454 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 80mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 13.5W PD, 33W UFCS, 33W PPS 50W wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | - | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | - | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno15 Pro Max
- Faster processor with Dimensity 9400 (3nm)
- Industry-leading 120W wired charging
- Potentially superior gaming performance
- Battery life likely shorter than X100 Pro
- Camera specs currently unknown
vivo X100 Pro
- Excellent battery life (13:53h active use)
- Brighter display (1472 nits)
- Potentially superior camera system
- Slightly slower processor (Dimensity 9300, 4nm)
- Slower wired charging (100W)
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1472 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno15 Pro Max’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. Both devices likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. Without further data on the Reno15 Pro Max’s panel, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or bezel size, but the X100 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
The context data highlights 'Photo / Video' capabilities for the vivo X100 Pro, but lacks specific sensor details. Given vivo’s history, it’s reasonable to expect a high-resolution main sensor with advanced OIS. The Reno15 Pro Max’s camera specs are also absent, making a direct comparison impossible. However, the X100 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a stronger emphasis on image processing and overall camera quality. Without sensor size and aperture information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance, but the X100 Pro is likely to excel in this area.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno15 Pro Max utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9400, fabricated on a more efficient 3nm process, featuring a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz. This contrasts with the vivo X100 Pro’s Dimensity 9300, built on a 4nm node, and topped by a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.25 GHz. The 3nm process and higher clock speed of the X925 suggest a performance advantage for the Reno15 Pro Max in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the X100 Pro’s CPU configuration, with three Cortex-X4 cores, may offer sustained multi-core performance. Both devices likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but thermal management will be crucial in determining real-world performance consistency.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 13 hours and 53 minutes of active use. The Reno15 Pro Max’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 120W wired charging (along with 50W wireless) significantly surpasses the X100 Pro’s 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. The Reno15 Pro Max can reach 50% charge in a shorter time, but the X100 Pro’s longer battery life may negate the need for frequent top-ups. Both support reverse wired charging, adding to their versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 Pro Max if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding games and applications, and value the convenience of the fastest wired charging available. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, a refined camera experience, and a more balanced overall package, even if it means sacrificing some raw speed.