Oppo Reno15 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S24+: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and ultra-fast charging, the Oppo Reno15 Pro Max with its Dimensity 9400 and 120W charging is the winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ offers a more refined software experience, a brighter display, and potentially longer battery life in real-world usage, making it a strong contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | - | 158.5 x 75.9 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | - | 196 g or 197 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~454 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+ | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520)10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) - USA/Canada/ChinaExynos 2400 (4 nm) - International |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) - USA/Canada/ChinaXclipse 940 - International |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 80mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 13.5W PD, 33W UFCS, 33W PPS 50W wireless Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 4900 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Onyx Black, Marble Grey, Cobalt Violet, Amber Yellow, Jade Green, Sandstone Orange, Sapphire Blue |
| Models | - | SM-S926B, SM-S926B/DS, SM-S926U, SM-S926U1, SM-S926W, SM-S926N, SM-S9260, SM-S926E, SM-S926E/DS |
| Price | - | $ 429.50 / € 549.00 / £ 445.98 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno15 Pro Max
- Blazing-fast Dimensity 9400 processor
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially superior thermal management due to 3nm process
- Camera specs are currently unknown
- Software support and long-term updates are less certain than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S24+
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Refined software experience with One UI
- Strong camera performance and video recording
- Slower charging speeds (45W wired)
- Exynos variant may suffer from thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1452 nits, crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Reno15 Pro Max’s display specs are not provided, Oppo typically utilizes high-quality AMOLED panels. The S24+'s brightness advantage, combined with Samsung’s established color calibration, likely provides a superior viewing experience. The S24+’s panel is also likely to feature LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving battery efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Reno15 Pro Max.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Reno15 Pro Max are missing, but Oppo typically focuses on strong image processing and versatile camera systems. The Galaxy S24+’s camera capabilities are well-documented, offering excellent photo and video quality. Without knowing the sensor sizes and apertures of the Reno15 Pro Max, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more refined, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The S24+'s video recording capabilities are also likely to be superior, benefiting from Qualcomm’s or Exynos’s advanced ISP.
Performance
The core architectural difference lies in the chipsets. The Reno15 Pro Max’s Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, features a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, suggesting a focus on peak performance. The S24+'s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) has a Cortex-X4 at 3.39 GHz, while the Exynos 2400 (4nm) has a Cortex-X4 at 3.2 GHz. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9400 *should* offer better power efficiency and thermal headroom, potentially allowing for sustained peak performance. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon is known for its optimized software integration and gaming performance. The Exynos variant raises concerns about potential thermal throttling, a common issue with previous Exynos chips.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ achieves a commendable 12:30h of active use, demonstrating solid battery life. The Reno15 Pro Max’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 120W wired charging is a game-changer, potentially offering a full charge in under 30 minutes. The S24+’s 45W charging, while respectable, is significantly slower. The Reno15 Pro Max also supports 50W wireless charging, dwarfing the S24+'s 15W wireless charging. The Reno15 Pro Max’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 Pro Max if you need the absolute fastest CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and value incredibly rapid charging speeds. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24+ if you prefer a more polished software ecosystem, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a proven track record of long-term software support. The S24+ is also the safer bet for those concerned about potential early adopter issues with the Reno15 Pro Max.