Oppo Reno15 Pro Max vs OnePlus 12R: A Clash of Chipsets and Charging Speeds
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the power user prioritizing cutting-edge performance and the fastest charging, the Oppo Reno15 Pro Max is the winner. However, the OnePlus 12R provides a compelling alternative with excellent battery life and a proven chipset, making it a strong contender for those seeking a balanced flagship experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno15 Pro Max | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | - | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~454 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+ | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 80mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 13.5W PD, 33W UFCS, 33W PPS 50W wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | - | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | - | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno15 Pro Max
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9400 chipset for top-tier performance
- Industry-leading 120W wired charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Versatile wireless charging options (50W and multiple standards)
- Battery capacity currently unknown, potentially smaller than the 12R
- Software optimization needs to be proven to fully leverage the Dimensity 9400
OnePlus 12R
- Excellent 14:32h active use battery life
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset with excellent thermal management
- Bright 1181 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Slower charging speed compared to the Reno15 Pro Max (26 minutes to 100%)
- Chipset is a generation older than the Reno15 Pro Max’s
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a bright display, peaking at 1181 nits measured, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the Reno15 Pro Max’s display specifications are currently unavailable, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The 12R’s brightness is a concrete advantage, and its panel technology is likely to be similar to the Reno15 Pro Max, but without knowing the Reno15 Pro Max’s specs, a definitive comparison is difficult. Both are expected to offer vibrant colors and good viewing angles, but the 12R has a measurable lead in peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Reno15 Pro Max, a direct comparison is limited. However, Oppo typically focuses on strong camera performance, and we can expect a capable main sensor. The OnePlus 12R’s camera system is likely to be a solid performer, but it’s unlikely to compete with flagship-level camera systems found on other devices. The focus should be on image processing algorithms and low-light performance, areas where software optimization plays a crucial role. We'll need to see sample images from both devices to assess their true capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno15 Pro Max’s Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, features a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, promising significant performance gains over the OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Dimensity 9400’s architecture, with its mix of X4 and A720 cores, suggests a focus on both peak performance and efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a well-optimized platform, and its thermal efficiency is well-documented. The Reno15 Pro Max *should* outperform the 12R in benchmarks, but real-world gains will depend on software optimization and thermal management. The 12R’s LPDDR5x RAM will contribute to smooth multitasking, but the Reno15 Pro Max’s newer chipset may offer a more substantial performance leap.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines with its impressive 14:32h active use battery score, indicating excellent endurance. The Reno15 Pro Max compensates with incredibly fast charging: 120W wired, 50W wireless, and multiple wireless charging standards (PD, UFCS, PPS). The 12R’s 100W charging, reaching 100% in 26 minutes, is still very fast, but the Reno15 Pro Max offers a significant advantage in charging speed. The Reno15 Pro Max’s battery capacity is unknown, but the faster charging could mitigate any capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno15 Pro Max if you need the absolute latest processor technology, the fastest wired and wireless charging available, and are willing to pay a premium for it. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prefer a more refined software experience, exceptional battery endurance demonstrated by its 14:32h active use score, and a proven, thermally efficient chipset at a potentially lower price point.