Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Oppo Reno14 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the superior device, offering a significantly more powerful processor, a brighter and more advanced display, and a more versatile camera system. However, the Oppo Reno14 Pro remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users prioritizing fast charging and a smooth user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno14 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 23 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 77 x 7.5 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 80mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 33W UFCS, 33W PPS 50W wireless Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gray, Brilliant White (Opal White), Purple | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | PKZ110, CPH2739 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 710 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno14 Pro
- Incredibly fast 80W wired charging
- Sleek and stylish design
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful processor than the S24 Ultra
- Camera system lacks the versatility of the S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Brilliant and adaptive display
- Advanced camera system with superior image quality
- Significantly higher price
- Slower wired charging compared to the Reno14 Pro
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1447 nits, compared to the Reno14 Pro’s likely lower peak brightness (based on market segment). The S24 Ultra’s panel likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving battery efficiency, while the Reno14 Pro’s display, while still excellent, likely lacks this feature. This translates to a more visible screen in direct sunlight and smoother scrolling on the S24 Ultra. Bezels are also expected to be narrower on the S24 Ultra, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, likely with a larger main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. While specific sensor details aren't provided, Samsung's history suggests a focus on computational photography and low-light performance. The Reno14 Pro’s camera, while capable, likely lacks the same level of detail and dynamic range. The S24 Ultra’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, with features like 8K recording and advanced stabilization. The Reno14 Pro’s camera is likely optimized for social media sharing and everyday photography.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the S24 Ultra represents a substantial leap in performance over the Reno14 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8450. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.39GHz, and its advanced architecture deliver superior CPU and GPU performance. While both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from architectural improvements and a more powerful Adreno GPU, resulting in smoother gaming and faster application loading times. The S24 Ultra also benefits from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance. The Reno14 Pro’s Dimensity 8450 remains capable, but will show its limitations in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra achieves an impressive 13:49h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. While the Reno14 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the S24 Ultra’s larger battery and more efficient chipset contribute to its longer runtime. The Reno14 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 80W wired charging allows for a full charge in under 40 minutes, while the S24 Ultra’s 45W charging takes longer, reaching 65% in 30 minutes. The Reno14 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging, far exceeding the S24 Ultra’s 15W Qi wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno14 Pro if you prioritize incredibly fast 80W wired charging, a sleek design, and a more affordable price point without sacrificing everyday performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you demand the absolute best in processing power, camera capabilities, display technology, and long-term software support, and are willing to pay a premium for it.