The Oppo Reno14 Pro, leveraging MediaTek's Dimensity 8450, represents a compelling value proposition in the flagship space. However, the Huawei Pura 70 Pro+ arrives with the in-house Kirin 9010, aiming to redefine the premium experience despite ongoing geopolitical constraints. This comparison dissects these two devices, focusing on where their architectural choices translate into real-world benefits for the user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a more open software experience, the Oppo Reno14 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its 4nm Dimensity 8450 offers a balance of power and efficiency, while the Pura 70 Pro+'s Kirin 9010, built on a 7nm process, may struggle with sustained loads and software limitations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2024, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 23 | Available. Released 2024, April 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 77 x 7.5 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.30 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Crystal Shield Glass | Kunlun Glass (Xuanwu tempered) |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1260 x 2844 pixels (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, HDR, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.25 GHz | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.18 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Kirin 9010 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | - |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | HarmonyOS 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.8, 80mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom
50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-4.0, 25mm (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS
48 MP, f/2.1, 93mm (telephoto), PDAF (5cm - ∞), OIS, 3.5x optical zoom
12.5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | Yes, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 33W UFCS, 33W PPS
50W wireless
Reverse wired | 100W wired
80W wireless
20W reverse wireless
18W reverse wired |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gray, Brilliant White (Opal White), Purple | Black, White, Silver |
| Models | PKZ110, CPH2739 | HBN-AL10, HBN-AL80 |
| Price | About 710 EUR | About 1050 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo Reno14 Pro
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 8450 chipset
- Wider compatibility with charging standards (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Access to full Google Play Services ecosystem
- Slower wired charging (80W vs 100W)
- Potentially less advanced camera system compared to Huawei
Huawei Pura 70 Pro+
- Faster 100W wired and 80W wireless charging
- Potentially superior camera hardware and image processing
- Huawei’s reputation for display color accuracy
- Less efficient 7nm Kirin 9010 chipset
- Limited access to Google Play Services and apps
- Potential for software restrictions and updates
Display Comparison
While specific display specs aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels. However, the Reno14 Pro's use of a more recent chipset suggests potential for more advanced display features like variable refresh rate (LTPO) for improved power efficiency. The Kirin 9010, being older, may lack this optimization. The Pura 70 Pro+’s display is likely tuned for color accuracy, a Huawei strength, but the Reno14 Pro’s panel could benefit from the newer processing capabilities of the Dimensity 8450 for superior image processing and upscaling.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, we can infer based on brand reputation. Huawei consistently excels in camera technology, and the Pura 70 Pro+ likely features a sophisticated multi-camera system with a large main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. However, the Reno14 Pro, while potentially lacking the same level of hardware innovation, benefits from the Dimensity 8450’s powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) for faster image processing and improved low-light performance. The Pura 70 Pro+'s image processing style is typically more saturated and contrasty, while Oppo tends towards a more natural look. OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is expected on both, but the Pura 70 Pro+ may have a more advanced implementation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno14 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4nm) boasts a higher clock speed (3.25 GHz) and a more efficient manufacturing process compared to the Huawei Pura 70 Pro+'s Kirin 9010 (7nm). This translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under heavy loads. The Kirin 9010’s CPU configuration – a mix of Taishan big cores, mid cores, and Cortex-A510 efficiency cores – aims for a balance, but the 7nm process is inherently less efficient. The Reno14 Pro, paired with likely LPDDR5x RAM, will exhibit faster app loading and multitasking speeds. The Kirin 9010 may show its age in demanding tasks, potentially experiencing more noticeable throttling.
Battery Life
The Huawei Pura 70 Pro+ takes the lead in charging speed with 100W wired charging, significantly faster than the Reno14 Pro’s 80W. The Pura 70 Pro+ also offers 80W wireless charging, exceeding the Reno14 Pro’s 50W. However, the Reno14 Pro compensates with multiple charging standards (PD, UFCS, PPS) for broader compatibility. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Pura 70 Pro+ mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Reno14 Pro’s more efficient chipset could translate to longer real-world battery life despite the slower charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno14 Pro if you need a consistently powerful performer with access to the full Google Play ecosystem and a wider range of apps. It’s ideal for gamers and power users who value long-term software support. Buy the Huawei Pura 70 Pro+ if you prioritize camera innovation and are comfortable navigating Huawei’s AppGallery and potential software restrictions, and value the faster 100W charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 9010 in the Pura 70 Pro+ overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The 7nm process of the Kirin 9010 is more prone to thermal throttling compared to the Reno14 Pro’s 4nm Dimensity 8450. While Huawei employs cooling solutions, expect potential performance drops during prolonged, graphically intensive gaming. The Reno14 Pro will likely maintain higher sustained performance.
❓ How does the lack of Google Play Services on the Pura 70 Pro+ impact daily usability?
The Pura 70 Pro+ relies on Huawei’s AppGallery and alternative app sources. While many popular apps are available, some may be missing or require workarounds. This can significantly impact the user experience for those heavily reliant on Google services like Gmail, Maps, and YouTube.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno14 Pro support high frame rate gaming (90fps or 120fps) in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 8450 is capable of supporting high frame rates in PUBG Mobile and other demanding games. However, achieving 90fps or 120fps will depend on the game’s optimization and the graphics settings used. The Reno14 Pro’s efficient chipset and cooling system should allow for stable high frame rate gameplay.
❓ What are the benefits of the multiple charging standards (PD, UFCS, PPS) supported by the Oppo Reno14 Pro?
Supporting multiple charging standards ensures compatibility with a wider range of chargers and power banks. PD (Power Delivery) is a common standard, while UFCS (Universal Fast Charging Standard) and PPS (Programmable Power Supply) offer optimized charging for specific devices, potentially leading to faster and more efficient charging.
