Oppo Reno14 F vs Realme 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Oppo Reno14 F is the clear winner. Its 63-hour battery endurance significantly outpaces the Realme 12 Pro+'s 13:24h active use score. However, if rapid charging and a brighter screen are paramount, the Realme 12 Pro+ offers a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno14 F | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 25 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 16 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.22 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | AGC Dragontrail DT-Star D+, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 105.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2, QC2.0, 44W PPS Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glossy Pink, Luminous Green, Opal Blue | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | CPH2743 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | $ 413.81 / £ 281.19 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 63:00h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (300 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno14 F
- Exceptional 63-hour battery endurance
- 1600 charge cycle battery lifespan
- Versatile charging options (PD2, QC2.0, PPS, Reverse Wired)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Realme 12 Pro+
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Realme 12 Pro+
- Faster 67W charging (50% in 19 minutes)
- Brighter 802 nit display
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life (13:24h active use)
- Potentially higher power consumption due to brighter display
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits. While the Reno14 F’s peak brightness isn’t specified, the Realme’s higher output will provide superior visibility outdoors. Both devices utilize a 4nm chipset, suggesting similar power efficiency, but the Realme’s brighter screen will inevitably draw more power. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate adjustments won’t be as dynamic, potentially impacting battery life during less demanding tasks.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-focused device, and its higher price point suggests a more sophisticated imaging system. The Reno14 F likely prioritizes a balanced camera experience, while the Realme 12 Pro+ may offer features like improved low-light performance or more advanced image processing. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Realme’s marketing suggests a stronger emphasis on photography.
Performance
Both phones leverage Qualcomm’s 4nm process, but the Realme 12 Pro+ edges ahead with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, featuring a slightly faster CPU clock speed (2.40 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Reno14 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1). This translates to a noticeable performance boost in demanding applications and gaming. The CPU architecture is similar – both utilize Cortex-A78 and A55 cores – but the higher clock speeds and potentially more efficient GPU in the 7s Gen 2 give the Realme the advantage. While both likely feature LPDDR4X RAM, the Realme’s chipset is better equipped to handle more intensive multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno14 F’s 63-hour endurance is a standout feature, indicating exceptional battery optimization. While the Realme 12 Pro+ offers a faster 67W charging solution (50% in 19 minutes), its 13:24h active use score falls considerably short of the Reno14 F. The Reno14 F supports 45W wired charging with PD2, QC2.0, and 44W PPS, alongside reverse wired charging, offering versatility. The Realme’s faster charging is convenient, but the Reno14 F’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The Reno14 F also boasts a claimed 1600 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno14 F if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value battery life above all else. It's ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display and appreciate the convenience of 67W fast charging, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance. This phone is geared towards users who consume a lot of media and want a quick power boost.