Oppo Reno13 vs. vivo V29e: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Reno13 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8350 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and better gaming capabilities. However, the vivo V29e offers a compelling option for those seeking a reliable daily driver with decent battery life at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 | vivo V29e |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 25 | 2023, October 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2023, October 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 157.9 x 74.7 x 7.2 mm (6.22 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1150 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", AF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, UFCS 33W, PPS 33W Reverse wired | 44W wired |
| Type | 5600 mAh | Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plume White, Luminous Blue, Black, Purple, Blue | Forest Black, Rose Gold, Ice Creek Blue |
| Models | CPH2689, PKM110 | V2317 |
| Price | € 409.95 / $ 470.00 / £ 344.99 / ₹ 23,999 | About 320 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 64:19h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (120 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for rapid replenishment
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price point
- More powerful chipset may consume more battery during heavy use
vivo V29e
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 for good battery life
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor struggles with demanding games
- 44W charging is slower than the Reno13
- Likely lower display brightness
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno13 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1204 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the V29e’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be lower, impacting outdoor usability. The Reno13’s higher brightness, combined with a potentially higher refresh rate (assumed based on Reno series trends), will provide a more immersive viewing experience. Color accuracy and panel type (likely AMOLED on both) are unknown for the V29e, but the Reno13’s brightness advantage is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for both devices, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Reno13 will have more processing power dedicated to image processing, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Reno13’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) benefits from the Dimensity 8350’s capabilities. While the V29e likely offers a competent camera for social media, the Reno13 is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. We assume both phones will feature a standard multi-camera setup, but the Reno13’s processing advantage is key.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Oppo Reno13’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) is a significantly more powerful chipset than the vivo V29e’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8350’s octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-A715 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, provides a considerable performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 695, while capable for everyday use, will struggle with demanding games and applications. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8350 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Reno13 is the clear choice for gamers and power users.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 offers a compelling battery package with 64:19h endurance and 80W wired charging. This translates to a significantly faster charging experience compared to the vivo V29e’s 44W charging. While the V29e may offer slightly longer standby times due to the less power-hungry chipset, the Reno13’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery life concerns. The Reno13’s 1600 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself. The Reno13’s active use score of 16:50h further demonstrates its strong battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, graphic-intensive gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its superior chipset and faster charging will be invaluable. Buy the vivo V29e if you prioritize all-day battery life, a smooth user experience for everyday tasks, and a more budget-friendly price tag. It’s ideal for social media, communication, and light entertainment.