Oppo Reno13 vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Oppo Reno13 is the stronger choice, boasting a significantly longer battery endurance score of 64:19h. However, if rapid charging is paramount and you frequently need to top up quickly, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s 125W charging, achieving a full charge in just 18 minutes, is a clear advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 25 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.9 x 74.7 x 7.2 mm (6.22 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, UFCS 33W, PPS 33W Reverse wired | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5600 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plume White, Luminous Blue, Black, Purple, Blue | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | CPH2689, PKM110 | XT2403-2 |
| Price | € 409.95 / $ 470.00 / £ 344.99 / ₹ 23,999 | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 64:19h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (120 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13
- Exceptional battery life (64:19h endurance)
- Efficient Dimensity 8350 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Charging speed is slower than the Edge 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W wired charging (18 min 0-100%)
- Higher peak display brightness (1295 nits)
- 50W wireless charging support
- Significantly shorter battery life (11:59h endurance)
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno13 and Motorola Edge 50 Pro feature displays capable of reaching high brightness levels, with the Edge 50 Pro marginally edging out the Reno13 at 1295 nits versus 1204 nits. While both are excellent for outdoor visibility, the difference is unlikely to be dramatically noticeable in everyday use. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), so we must assume standard OLED panels. The higher peak brightness of the Motorola Edge 50 Pro will benefit users consuming HDR content or using the phone in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the CPU, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s ISP capabilities will play a crucial role. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon ISPs are generally known for strong image processing and video stabilization. The Reno13’s Dimensity 8350 also features a capable ISP, but its strengths may lie in different areas, such as computational photography. Without knowing sensor sizes or lens apertures, it’s difficult to definitively say which phone will deliver superior image quality. We can assume both phones will offer competent camera performance for social media and casual photography.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm), while the Oppo Reno13 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4nm). While both are 4nm chips, the Dimensity 8350’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – suggests a focus on sustained multi-core performance. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 configuration may prioritize single-core responsiveness. The Reno13’s CPU architecture suggests it will handle demanding multitasking and content creation more effectively, while the Edge 50 Pro may feel snappier in everyday tasks. The lack of RAM specifications prevents a full assessment of performance potential.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 64:19h score and 1600 charge cycles, compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s 11:59h active use score. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges for the Reno13. While the Edge 50 Pro compensates with incredibly fast 125W wired charging (0-100% in 18 minutes) and 50W wireless charging, the Reno13’s 80W wired charging, alongside PD, UFCS 33W, and PPS 33W support, is still respectable. The Reno13 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Edge 50 Pro. The Edge 50 Pro’s charging speed is ideal for users who need a quick power boost, but the Reno13’s superior endurance minimizes the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day and beyond, and value sustained performance over peak bursts. It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery life and don’t want to be tethered to a charger. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prefer a phone that can be quickly replenished with its 125W charging, and appreciate a slightly brighter display, even if it comes at the cost of overall battery endurance.