Oppo Reno13 vs Google Pixel 8a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and software experience, the Google Pixel 8a is the better choice, thanks to its significantly superior battery endurance (40:06h vs 19h). However, the Oppo Reno13 appeals to power users who value faster charging and a more potent processor for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 | Google Pixel 8a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - G6GPR (International) |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G6GPR (International) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 25 | 2024, May 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2024, May 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 157.9 x 74.7 x 7.2 mm (6.22 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) | 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~430 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 120Hz, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP (16 MP eff.), f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, UFCS 33W, PPS 33W Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 5600 mAh | Li-Po 4492 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plume White, Luminous Blue, Black, Purple, Blue | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Aloe |
| Models | CPH2689, PKM110 | GKV4X, G6GPR, G8HHN, G576D |
| Price | € 409.95 / $ 470.00 / £ 344.99 / ₹ 23,999 | $ 229.98 / C$ 417.99 / £ 279.00 / € 299.99 / ₹ 33,300 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 64:19h endurance, 1600 cycles | 40:06h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class C (120 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class B |
Oppo Reno13
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 8350
- Longer advertised battery cycle life (1600 cycles)
- Much shorter battery endurance (19h vs 40:06h)
- Less refined software experience compared to Pixel
- Camera performance likely trails the Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
- Exceptional battery life (40:06h endurance)
- Superior camera performance and image processing
- Clean and optimized Android software experience
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Less raw CPU power compared to Reno13
- Lower peak display brightness than Reno13
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize 4nm chipsets, but diverge significantly in display characteristics. The Pixel 8a boasts a higher peak brightness of 1508 nits compared to the Reno13’s 1204 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both offer excellent clarity, the Pixel 8a’s brightness advantage is noticeable. Details regarding panel technology (OLED vs AMOLED) and refresh rate are missing for the Reno13, but the Pixel 8a’s display is known for its color accuracy and smooth scrolling. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar overall form factors.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8a is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms. While specific sensor details are missing for the Reno13, the Pixel 8a’s camera system benefits from Google’s software optimizations, resulting in consistently excellent image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 8a’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The Reno13’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor size and lens aperture, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 8a’s software-driven advantages without detailed specifications.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno13’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350, with its octa-core configuration (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510), is geared towards raw processing power. The Google Pixel 8a’s Google Tensor G3, a nona-core processor (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510), prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks. The Cortex-X3 in the Tensor G3 provides a performance boost in specific AI-driven applications, like image processing and voice recognition. Both utilize a 4nm process, but the architectural differences mean the Reno13 will likely excel in CPU-intensive benchmarks, while the Pixel 8a shines in AI tasks. RAM specifications are missing for the Reno13, but both likely utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the Google Pixel 8a. Its endurance rating of 40:06h significantly surpasses the Oppo Reno13’s 19h. The Reno13 compensates with incredibly fast 80W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Pixel 8a’s 18W charging. The Pixel 8a also supports 7.5W wireless charging and 'bypass charging', which minimizes heat during charging, potentially extending battery lifespan. The Reno13’s 1600 battery cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, but the Pixel 8a’s superior capacity and efficiency provide a more substantial real-world benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 if you need a phone that can rapidly recharge and handle intensive gaming or multitasking without slowdowns. Its 80W charging and Dimensity 8350 chipset cater to users who prioritize speed and efficiency. Buy the Google Pixel 8a if you prefer a streamlined software experience, exceptional camera performance, and all-day battery life, even with moderate to heavy use. The Pixel 8a is ideal for users who value simplicity and consistent performance.