Oppo Reno13 Pro vs. Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Oppo Reno13 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 57:36h battery endurance. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W charging and Dimensity 9300+ chipset make it the superior choice for those who demand peak performance and minimal downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 Pro | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 25 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 76.6 x 7.6 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g or 197 g (6.88 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, UFCS 33W, PPS 33W 50W wireless (China only) Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Pink | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | CPH2697, PKK110 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | $ 739.00 / £ 469.99 / € 479.99 / ₹ 35,999 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 57:36h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (120 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (57:36h endurance)
- 80W fast wired charging with multiple protocols (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1600 cycles)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Slower charging speeds than the Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in 19 minutes)
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- 50W wireless charging
- Shorter battery life compared to the Oppo Reno13 Pro
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ. The Xiaomi 14T Pro reaches 1228 nits of peak brightness, slightly trailing the Oppo Reno13 Pro’s measured 1168 nits. While the difference isn’t massive, the Reno13 Pro’s higher peak brightness could provide a slight edge in direct sunlight. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), but both are expected to offer smooth scrolling experiences. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, requiring further testing for a complete assessment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the 14T Pro will have a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of sensor details necessitates caution; a larger sensor on either device would be a significant advantage. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is crucial for video recording and low-light photography, but is not specified for either phone. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to be a deciding factor for most users.
Performance
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ represents a significant leap in performance over the Reno13 Pro’s Dimensity 8350. The 9300+ features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4 GHz, compared to the Reno13 Pro’s 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715. This architectural difference, combined with the 9300+'s more efficient core configuration (3x Cortex-X4 vs 3x Cortex-A715), translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 14T Pro’s chipset is expected to handle graphically intensive tasks with greater ease. While both use 4nm fabrication, the 9300+’s newer architecture offers improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, achieving 57:36h in testing and an active use score of 16:42h. This significantly surpasses the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s active use score of 12:32h. However, the 14T Pro compensates with its blistering 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Reno13 Pro’s 80W charging is still fast, but considerably slower. The 14T Pro also offers 50W wireless charging (100% in 45 min), while the Reno13 Pro offers 50W wireless charging only in China. The Reno13 Pro’s 1600 cycle battery lifespan suggests greater long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 Pro if you need a phone that reliably lasts through a full day and beyond, even with heavy use, and value a more balanced feature set. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming or demanding applications, and absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds – being tethered to a charger for under 20 minutes is a significant advantage.