Oppo Reno13 Pro vs. vivo X100 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a balanced experience, the Oppo Reno13 Pro emerges as the winner. Its impressive 57:36h endurance and 80W charging outweigh the vivo X100 Pro’s raw performance advantage, especially considering the X100 Pro’s shorter active use score of 13:53h.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 Pro | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 25 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 76.6 x 7.6 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g or 197 g (6.88 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, UFCS 33W, PPS 33W 50W wireless (China only) Reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Pink | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | CPH2697, PKK110 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | $ 739.00 / £ 469.99 / € 479.99 / ₹ 35,999 | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 57:36h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (120 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (57:36h endurance)
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1600 cycles)
- Less powerful chipset than the vivo X100 Pro
- Lower peak display brightness
vivo X100 Pro
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9300
- Higher peak display brightness
- Faster 100W wired charging
- Significantly shorter battery life (13:53h active use)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature vibrant displays, but the vivo X100 Pro boasts a higher peak brightness of 1472 nits compared to the Reno13 Pro’s 1168 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display power draw will impact overall battery life. The Reno13 Pro’s slightly lower peak brightness is a reasonable trade-off for its significantly improved endurance. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) are missing, but both are expected to offer smooth scrolling and adaptive refresh rates typical of flagship devices.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the vivo X100 Pro highlights its camera capabilities, but lacks specific sensor details. Given vivo’s history, it’s likely to feature a larger main sensor with advanced image processing. The Reno13 Pro’s camera specs are absent, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the X100 Pro’s focus on 'Photo / Video' suggests a more comprehensive camera system geared towards content creation. We can assume the X100 Pro will offer more advanced features like 8K video recording and sophisticated computational photography algorithms.
Performance
The vivo X100 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300, with its Cortex-X4 prime core, represents a significant leap in performance over the Reno13 Pro’s Dimensity 8350. The X4 core architecture, clocked at 3.25 GHz, offers improved single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Reno13 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) is still capable, but will lag behind in CPU-intensive tasks. The Dimensity 9300’s GPU will also provide a more substantial gaming experience. However, the Reno13 Pro’s thermal management, aided by the 4nm process, may prevent the X100 Pro from sustaining peak performance for extended periods.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 Pro’s endurance of 57:36h is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the vivo X100 Pro’s active use score of 13:53h. This difference is likely due to a combination of battery optimization and the less power-hungry Dimensity 8350. While the X100 Pro boasts 100W wired charging (50% in 14 minutes), offering faster top-ups, the Reno13 Pro’s 80W charging is still respectable. Both support wireless charging, but the Reno13 Pro’s 50W wireless charging (China only) is a potential advantage. The Reno13 Pro’s 1600 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, fast charging, and a bright, vibrant display for everyday use. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and a smooth, reliable experience. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you demand the absolute fastest performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and are willing to trade some battery life for that extra power. It caters to power users and content creators.